Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0705.1390

Machine and Component Residual Life Estimation through the Application of Neural Networks

Abstract

This paper concerns the use of neural networks for predicting the residual life of machines and components. In addition, the advantage of using condition-monitoring data to enhance the predictive capability of these neural networks was also investigated. A number of neural network variations were trained and tested with the data of two different reliability-related datasets. The first dataset represents the renewal case where the failed unit is repaired and restored to a good-as-new condition. Data was collected in the laboratory by subjecting a series of similar test pieces to fatigue loading with a hydraulic actuator. The average prediction error of the various neural networks being compared varied from 431 to 841 seconds on this dataset, where test pieces had a characteristic life of 8,971 seconds. The second dataset was collected from a group of pumps used to circulate a water and magnetite solution within a plant. The data therefore originated from a repaired system affected by reliability degradation. When optimized, the multi-layer perceptron neural networks trained with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and the general regression neural network produced a sum-of-squares error within 11.1% of each other. The potential for using neural networks for residual life prediction and the advantage of incorporating condition-based data into the model were proven for both examples.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M. A. Herzog, T. Marwala, P. S. Heyns. 2007-05-10. Machine and Component Residual Life Estimation through the Application of Neural Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1390

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

SkillRefine: Cross-Source Skill Induction and Execution Validation for LLM Agents in Refinery Planning Software

Operating industrial planning software such as AspenTech PIMS (Process Industry Modeling System) requires an LLM agent to combine structural knowledge, procedural knowledge from expert records, and constraints revealed only during execution. These evidence sources are heterogeneous and individually incomplete: documentation describes tables and interfaces but omits task-level coordination, expert CASE records expose multi-table modification patterns without explicit schema grounding, and execution feedback reveals latent constraints only when a plan is executed. We present \textsc{SkillRefine}, a framework that exploits the Documentation--Practice Gap between documented structure and expert practice to extract candidate coordination patterns, ground them against table definitions and COM specifications, and compile them into progressively disclosed skill packages with provenance. The library is then refined through label-free compliance screening, oracle-based match decomposition over table, row, column, and value dimensions, and signal-conditioned trajectory attribution for localized repair. We evaluate \textsc{SkillRefine} on PIMS-Bench, a benchmark built from two AspenTech PIMS demonstration models, using disjoint construction and held-out test tasks. On the held-out test set, \textsc{SkillRefine} achieves absolute component match F1 gains of 14\%--30\% across four LLM backbones, with the largest gains on complex multi-table coordination tasks.

cs.CE↗

Simulation-Efficient Analog Circuit Yield Optimization via Monte Carlo Zeroth-Order Gradient Estimation

Yield optimization under process variation is expensive because each candidate design must be evaluated across many Monte Carlo SPICE samples. The resulting finite-sample yield is also piecewise constant in the design parameters, providing little local information for optimization. We introduce zeroth-order Monte Carlo stochastic gradient descent (ZO-MC-SGD), a black-box method that converts continuous specification margins into stochastic descent directions. Each update evaluates opposite design perturbations under shared process samples, allowing a small simulation batch to estimate a local direction without differentiating SPICE or fitting a global surrogate model. A Spearman rank-correlation test checks that the margin-based loss orders designs consistently with empirical yield. We prove that the estimator is unbiased for a Gaussian-smoothed surrogate and derive variance and sample-complexity bounds with no explicit dependence on process dimension. Across five analog circuit benchmarks with up to 30 design variables and 42 process variables, ZO-MC-SGD reaches a mean yield of 0.95 on four circuits within 50--200 simulations and the empirical yield ceiling on the fifth. Relative to the best of five black-box and learning-based baselines, it reduces the required simulation budget by up to a factor of eight.

cs.CE↗

Centering Drives Normalization Gains: Price-Offset Nuisances in Cross-Sectional Return Prediction

Cross-sectional return prediction from raw intraday bars is sensitive to each instrument price level, an additive nuisance under a return-ranking hypothesis. We test whether removing this offset, rather than rescaling amplitudes or changing the encoder, explains gains on a point-in-time CSI~300 five-minute panel. We evaluate eight parameter-matched encoders with and without RevIN normalization; a parameter-free ladder then separates identity, scale-only, centering, last-value referencing, differencing, and standardization across all fields and restricted channels. Centering drives the reliable effect, while scale-only normalization does not help. All eight paired effects are positive and survive Holm correction on raw rank IC, after style residualization, and after further residualizing on short-term reversal. Among six stronger encoders, gains of 0.0376-0.0567 exceed the 0.0109 spread of normalized IC (0.0830-0.0939). Price-only standardization retains 93--101% of the all-field gain. These results place the main effect in transformed price-channel offset removal rather than amplitude scaling or encoder choice.

cs.CE↗