Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0706.0440

What Makes a System Complex? an Approach to Self-Organization and Emergence

Abstract

The fast changing reality in technical and natural domains perceived by always more accurate observations has drawn attention on new and very broad class of systems with specific behaviour represented under the common wording complexity. From elementary system graph representation with components as nodes and interactions as vertices, systems are shown to belong to only three states : simple, complicated, and complex, the main properties of which are discussed. The first two states have been studied at length over past centuries, and last one finds its origin in the elementary fact that when system performance is pushed up, there exists a threshold above which interaction between components overtake outside interaction. Then system self-organizes and filters corresponding outer action, making it more robust to outer effect, with emergence of new behaviour not predictable from only components study. Examples in Physics and Biology are given. Three main classes of complexity behaviour are distinguished corresponding to different grades of difficulty to handle their dynamics. The interest of using complex state properties in man-made systems is stressed. Important issues concentrating on the difficult balance between relative system isolation when becoming complex and required delegation of corresponding new capability from (outside) operator are discussed. This implies giving the system some intelligence in an adequate frame between new augmented system state and supervising operator, with consequences on canonical system triplet {effector-sensor-controller} to be reorganized in this new setting. Moreover, entering complexity state opens the possibility for function to feedback onto structure, ie to mimic at technical level the invention of Nature over Her very long history.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michel Cotsaftis. 2007-06-06. What Makes a System Complex? an Approach to Self-Organization and Emergence. https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.0440

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Steering the dynamics by controlling the temporal interaction network

Many real-world coupled dynamical systems have their interaction structure and strength that evolve or adapt over time. Here, we investigate how one can control the state of a system by tuning its temporal interaction network. We present a framework based on nonlinear optimal control, where one has control over the time-dependent coupling matrix of a dynamical system. We show how to obtain the gradient of the Lagrangian functional of a generic optimal control problem using the adjoint method, where the control variables are multiplicative inputs. We illustrate the theory with the precision cost that aims at steering the nodal states to prescribed target trajectories. We first focus on a linear time-variant system for which further expressions of the gradient can be obtained. Second, we uncover the temporal interaction that pushes a nonlinear neural units model towards target trajectories. For both systems, we numerically solve the optimal control problem, imposing various constraint on the structure of the controlled edges. The workflow presented here can be leveraged to steer the dynamics of systems with artificial or engineered interaction that is tunable.

nlin.AO↗

Paths to synchronization in the Kuramoto model with inertia

Synchronization is ubiquitous across natural and synthetic systems, yet most prior studies focus on the inertia-free Kuramoto model and do so at the macroscopic level. In this study, we instead investigate the inertial Kuramoto model and analyze the kinetics of individual synchronized clusters that emerge in the underdamped dynamics, driven by the interactions among multiple synchronized clusters with different frequencies. Specifically, we explore two forms of intrinsic frequency distribution -- unimodal Gaussian and multimodal uniform -- and show that they give rise to qualitatively different synchronized clusters: a hierarchical organization for the Gaussian distribution and a homogeneous organization for the uniform distribution. This contrast leads to qualitatively different behaviors of the order parameter: for the Gaussian distribution, it increases smoothly with increasing coupling strength, while for the uniform distribution, it grows through a series of discrete jumps that trace out the size of the Devil's staircase (DS). By resolving the kinetics at the cluster level, we further find that the route to synchronization also depends on the distribution type: with a Gaussian distribution, a single dominant cluster forms and gradually entrains the remaining oscillators, whereas with a uniform distribution, synchronization proceeds via successive cluster mergers initiated from peripheral seeds associated with the high-frequency periphery. Taken together, these findings provide a new perspective on collective synchronization dynamics in inertial complex systems.

nlin.AO↗

Explosive Synchronization in Inertial Kuramoto Models: Determining Resilience in Power Grids

Maintaining power-grid stability is essential for a sustainable energy supply. Using empirical power-grid data, we show that the inertial Kuramoto model with correlated powers and coupling strengths provides a relevant framework for analyzing explosive synchronization and grid stability. We identify two distinct synchronization pathways, initiated by population-driven or coupling-driven seed rotors, that yield different order-parameter behaviors. Inertia, in turn, determines whether the resulting seed clusters retain distinct angular velocities. Similar mechanisms govern recovery from external disturbances, linking power-grid resilience to these two nucleation pathways. Our findings provide a microscopic framework for understanding synchronization and recovery, with implications for stable power-grid operation.

nlin.AO↗