Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0706.0474

Stability of utility-maximization in incomplete markets

Abstract

The effectiveness of utility-maximization techniques for portfolio management relies on our ability to estimate correctly the parameters of the dynamics of the underlying financial assets. In the setting of complete or incomplete financial markets, we investigate whether small perturbations of the market coefficient processes lead to small changes in the agent's optimal behavior derived from the solution of the related utility-maximization problems. Specifically, we identify the topologies on the parameter process space and the solution space under which utility-maximization is a continuous operation, and we provide a counterexample showing that our results are best possible, in a certain sense. A novel result about the structure of the solution of the utility-maximization problem where prices are modeled by continuous semimartingales is established as an offshoot of the proof of our central theorem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kasper Larsen, Gordan Zitkovic. 2007-06-04. Stability of utility-maximization in incomplete markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.0474

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Active Portfolio Management in Concentrated Equity Markets

The equal-weighted portfolio is a passive, rule-based strategy that has historically been difficult to outperform, delivering higher returns than the capitalization-weighted "market" benchmark across many markets and periods. Stochastic portfolio theory (SPT) reveals that this relative performance is regime dependent, with the equal-weighted portfolio underperforming during periods of increasing market concentration and high correlations, particularly market bubbles. These observations have motivated us to formulate and solve a stochastic control problem in which an investor actively allocates between the equal-weighted and market portfolios. The investor bases their allocation decisions on forecasts made under a flexible stochastic diversity--dispersion (SDD) model. Using a quadratic surrogate for implementation frictions, we characterize the optimal allocation through a linear forward--backward SDE and obtain an explicit "aiming in front of a moving target" representation of the optimal trading rate, in the spirit of Gârleanu and Pedersen. The penalty parameters are calibrated in sample to match the cumulative wealth effect of proportional transaction costs, while out-of-sample performance is evaluated with those costs deducted directly from portfolio wealth. Using historical S&P 500 data, we show that a mean-reverting SDD specification reproduces several empirical features of market diversity and dispersion. In out-of-sample backtests from 1995 to 2024, the resulting strategies deliver higher cumulative net returns than both the equal-weighted and market portfolios, and higher information ratios than the equal-weighted portfolio after 15-basis-point proportional transaction costs.

q-fin.PM↗

Data-Driven Dynamic Portfolio Selection with Vine Copula Simulation and Reinforcement Learning

We develop a data-driven approach to dynamic portfolio selection that combines vine-copula simulation with reinforcement learning. The investor has constant relative risk aversion and maximises expected terminal utility with a running penalty on the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) of one-period losses. We estimate a conditional vine model from historical returns and use it to generate joint scenarios for CVaR evaluation and conditional paths for training a recurrent portfolio policy. Under uniform local derivative bounds, we propagate edgewise pair-copula parameter errors through the conditional transforms to obtain power-law stability bounds in Hellinger distance and total variation. In a finite-horizon investment model, we combine these estimates with a marginal and structural approximation budget to bound policy values, optimal values and the true-market loss of policies selected under a fitted model, with separate simulation and numerical optimisation terms. On a seven-asset panel comprising US and Chinese equities and gold, the selected ensemble of ten trained policies achieves a compound annual growth rate of 34.13% and a Sharpe ratio of 2.31 over 22 complete monthly holding periods, exceeding the corresponding values of six classical and vine-based benchmarks. Combining simulated and historical training data reduces monthly target-to-target turnover by 41.5% relative to training on historical data alone, while maintaining comparable growth.

q-fin.PM↗

The Missile and the Toll: Two-Way Flow Through the Strait of Hormuz

Tolls for safe passage and attacks on shipping are usually treated as mutually exclusive: either ships pay or attacks happen. We argue they are complementary. In a Stackelberg escalation game for the Strait of Hormuz, the enforcer chooses an attack intensity and a toll schedule; the response is to pay, cross exposed, wait, reroute, or exit. Attacks create the willingness to pay; tolls harvest it. The model predicts asymmetry across trade forms: a toll where the cargo owner can pay and the vessel owner will consent, and none where either fails. Any such payment is clandestine, but the model's implications are testable against freight rates, insurance premia, and incident reports.

q-fin.PM↗