Lectures on Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology

Luis A. Anchordoqui

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0706.1988

Lectures on Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology

Luis A. Anchordoqui

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This is a written version of a series of lectures aimed at undergraduate students in astrophysics/particle theory/particle experiment. We summarize the important progress made in recent years towards understanding high energy astrophysical processes and we survey the state of the art regarding the concordance model of cosmology.

Explore related subjects

physics.ed-ph astro-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Luis A. Anchordoqui. 2016-06-15. Lectures on Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology. https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1988

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

"I don't have a good metric for what other people think:" Unpacking the double empathy problem in neurodivergent physics problem-solving

Learning is a social act and requires communication between interlocutors. Learning also is a process that takes place in a socially constructed neuro-normative system. These neuro-normative systems can marginalize neurodivergent (i.e., autistic, dyslexic, epileptic) students, who oftentimes have non-normative socio-cognitive differences. In this paper, we investigate 3 neurodivergent physics students' experiences solving physics problems and in navigating physics culture. We use a Double-Empathy Problem lens to uncover how communication, particularly communication breakdowns, can manifest for neurodivergent students in physics. We find that the 3 neurodivergent students, experience communication breakdowns in their interactions with peers and instructors, and in interpreting problem statements. Furthermore, we find that participants experience fear of being misinterpreted or feeling as though they are viewed as stupid on account of communication breakdowns. We advocate for the need for a more neuro-inclusive physics culture and suggest actions that can be done by instructors to create more inclusive spaces in physics.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

From Venus to the Parking Lot: A Flexible Stellar Interferometry Experiment

We describe a simple extension of our earlier Venus interferometry demonstration that can be performed indoors or outdoors, independent of planetary visibility or atmospheric seeing. A small flashlight is placed 15-50 meters away from a telescope and covered with a circular aperture mask (hole diameter 2-6~mm). A small telescope fitted with an opaque mask bearing two 2~mm holes, spaced between 5 and 20~mm apart, is then used to observe interference fringes from this artificial extended source. By varying the hole separation and observing the fringes students can estimate the angular diameter of the source and verify their result directly by simple geometry, a check not possible with astronomical targets. The experiment requires no telescope tracking, no dark skies, and no special equipment beyond materials described in the original paper. It serves equally well as a pre-lab to build intuition before observing Venus, a standalone indoor daytime or outdoor nighttime activity, or a quantitative test of the interferometric method itself.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

Data-driven modeling in the introductory physics laboratory: Scaling analysis and data collapse in the specific heat of water experiment

We present a data-driven redesign of the classic specific-heat-of-water experiment that uses scaling analysis and data collapse for model construction rather than beginning with a previously established thermodynamic formula. The activity combines structured experimental and analytical guidance with instructor-mediated questioning, while the thermodynamic description is deliberately postponed. Students collect temperature-time data under different conditions and obtain a collapsed relation between the mass-normalized energy input and temperature rise through successive rescaling. They formulate an empirical model from this relation and test it using additional data not included in its construction. In the post-experimental discussion, the thermodynamic description shows that the fitted empirical constant characterizes the combined response of the water and calorimeter and approximates a quantity that depends weakly on water mass. Reanalysis of the mass-dependent data separates the two contributions, with limited precision over the available water-mass range. The copper cup is an intentional feature of the instructional design: its contribution is large enough to require physical interpretation but varies little enough over the explored mass range for the data to collapse approximately onto a single relation. The same apparatus thereby supports empirical model construction, thermodynamic interpretation, and separation of the component contributions.

physics.ed-ph↗