Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0706.2901

Analysis and control of network synchronizability

Abstract

In this paper, the investigation is first motivated by showing two examples of simple regular symmetrical graphs, which have the same structural parameters, such as average distance, degree distribution and node betweenness centrality, but have very different synchronizabilities. This demonstrates the complexity of the network synchronizability problem. For a given network with identical node dynamics, it is further shown that two key factors influencing the network synchronizability are the network inner linking matrix and the eigenvalues of the network topological matrix. Several examples are then provided to show that adding new edges to a network can either increase or decrease the network synchronizability. In searching for conditions under which the network synchronizability may be increased by adding edges, it is found that for networks with disconnected complementary graphs, adding edges never decreases their synchronizability. This implies that better understanding and careful manipulation of the complementary graphs are important and useful for enhancing the network synchronizability. Moreover, it is found that an unbounded synchronized region is always easier to analyze than a bounded synchronized region. Therefore, to effectively enhance the network synchronizability, a design method is finally presented for the inner linking matrix of rank 1 such that the resultant network has an unbounded synchronized region, for the case where the synchronous state is an equilibrium point of the network.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhisheng Duan, Guanrong Chen, Lin Huang. 2007-06-20. Analysis and control of network synchronizability. https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.2901

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Symmetries of the q-deformed real projective line

We generalize in two steps the quantized action of the modular group on q-deformed real numbers introduced by Morier-Genoud and Ovsienko. First, we let the projective general linear group PGL(2,Z) act on q-real numbers via a q-deformed action. The deformed matrices we get have combinatorial interpretations, and we show that their traces are palindromic polynomials. Then we consider an extension of the group PGL(2,Z) by the 2-elements cyclic group, and define a deformed action of this extension on q-real numbers. We deduce from these actions some underlying relations between q-real numbers, and between left and right versions of q-deformed rational numbers. In particular we investigate the case of some algebraic numbers of degree 4 and 6. We also prove that the deformation of real numbers is an injective process.

math.CO↗

Combinatorial Games and the Golden Ratio on Digraphs

We introduce a new combinatorial game called Triangle Game. In this game, a directed $3$-cycle graph is given, and stones are placed on each vertex. The player chooses a directed edge and takes at least one stone from the initial vertex. At the same time, the player is allowed to return some stones to the terminal vertex of the edge, as long as the total number of stones decreases. We describe the set of \Pps~under both normal play and misère play. The golden ratio $ϕ=\dfrac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$ plays an essential role in our description. We also show that Triangle Game is tame.

math.CO↗

Coloopless zonotopes and counterexamples to the Shifted Lonely Runner Conjecture

Henze and Malikiosis (2017) have shown that the Lonely Runner Conjecture (LRC) can be restated as a convex-geometric question on the so-called LR zonotopes, lattice zonotopes with one more generator than their dimension. This relation naturally suggests a more general statement, the shifted LRC, the zonotopal version of which concerns a classical parameter, the covering radius. In this paper we do two things: 1) We show explicit counterexamples to both the shifted Lonely Runner Conjecture (starting at $n=5$) and to the Lonely Vector Property of Malikiosis-Schymura-Santos (2025). 2) We push the analogies between the two versions of LRC and their zonotopal counterparts, in particular highlighting that the proofs of the finite-checking Theorems A and B in Malikiosis-Schymura-Santos (2025) are more transparent, and the statements more general, if regarded in terms of two quite general classes of lattice zonotopes: the coloopless zonotopes that we introduce here and the cosimple ones, already defined by them.

math.CO↗