Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0707.0329

Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record

Mareike Fischer·Mike Steel
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The problem of intermediates in the fossil record has been frequently discussed ever since Darwin. The extent of `gaps' (missing transitional stages) has been used to argue against gradual evolution from a common ancestor. Traditionally, gaps have often been explained by the improbability of fossilization and the discontinuous selection of found fossils. Here we take an analytical approach and demonstrate why, under certain sampling conditions, we may not expect intermediates to be found. Using a simple null model, we show mathematically that the question of whether a taxon sampled from some time in the past is likely to be morphologically intermediate to other samples (dated earlier and later) depends on the shape and dimensions of the underlying phylogenetic tree that connects the taxa, and the times from which the fossils are sampled.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mareike Fischer, Mike Steel. 2008-08-26. Expected Anomalies in the Fossil Record. https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0329

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Invading activity fronts or near-critical clusters may stabilize vulnerable excitable systems against stochastic trajectories terminating in an absorbing state

Stochastic chemical reaction or population dynamics in finite systems often terminates in an absorbing state. Yet in large spatially extended systems, the time to reach the absorbing configuration (e.g., species extinction or fixation) becomes exceedingly long. Tuning control parameters may effectively diminish the survival probability, rendering active states (species coexistence) susceptible to stochastic extinction events. In inhomogeneous settings, where a vulnerable subsystem is diffusively coupled to an adjacent stable patch, the former is re-activated through influx from the interfaces, provided the vulnerable region either sustains spreading activity fronts or near-critical large active clusters. Either dynamical structure resets the system to correlated initial conditions favorable for survival. We demonstrate this generic elimination of finite-size extinction instabilities via immigration flux in stochastic predator-prey, cyclic competition, and epidemic spreading models.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Consensus-level substitution rates are distinct from the virion-level rate

Estimating viral substitution rates is central to evolutionary epidemiology, and recent interest in within-host evolution has sharpened the question of what such rates measure. I distinguish two classes of evolutionary rate estimand that are rarely separated in phylogenetic analysis: the virion-level substitution rate (VLSR), a molecular quantity counting mutational events along lineages, and consensus-level substitution rates (CLSRs), population-summary quantities counting allele frequency threshold crossings from below. CLSRs are indexed by the consensus-generation rule. The VLSR and CLSRs are both biologically meaningful, but not interchangeable. Because the consensus-generation rule defines a given CLSR, it should be reported routinely. This reflection should help analysts make more informed methodological choices when working with sets of virus sequences.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

The resource cost of cooperative invasion

A contact network can favor cooperation by sheltering a lineage until its descendants compete with defectors as a group. We determine the contact strengths, invasion times and measurement effort needed to realize this advantage at fixed population size. Individuals reproduce according to averaged cooperation payoffs, and offspring replace neighbors through contacts of equal weight in both directions. Contact contrast is the ratio of strongest to weakest contact. Under weak selection on a six-site path, the least contrast needed to favor a single cooperator over the reverse invasion by a defector grows as $656ε^{-2}$ for uniformly placed mutants and $4050ε^{-3}$ for mutations in newborn offspring, as the benefit-cost ratio $b/c=1+ε$ approaches one. The extra power arises because rare replacement protects a site while suppressing mutation arrival there. Global bounds force two weakly coupled groups and exact mirror symmetry of the least-contrast contacts for sufficiently small $ε$. Under uniform introduction, additional contrast shortens the leading mean time to extinction or fixation in the absence of selection, from $12/ε$ toward $6/ε$ reproduction attempts, and eventually breaks the mirror symmetry of the fastest design. Estimating the uniform-introduction advantage from fixation outcomes of independent completed invasions defines a third optimum. Within the six-site family with mirror-symmetric, strongly separated contacts, we optimize contacts and selection strength with reproduction weighted linearly or exponentially by payoff. At fixed relative precision, with contrast a fixed factor above its minimum, the leading summed trial duration grows as $ε^{-3}$. Efficient measurement accepts a smaller advantage in exchange for shorter trials. The cheapest, fastest and most efficiently measured networks therefore differ.

q-bio.PE↗