Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0707.0648

Dial a Ride from k-forest

Anupam Gupta·MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi·Viswanath Nagarajan·R. Ravi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The k-forest problem is a common generalization of both the k-MST and the dense-$k$-subgraph problems. Formally, given a metric space on $n$ vertices $V$, with $m$ demand pairs $\subseteq V \times V$ and a ``target'' $k\le m$, the goal is to find a minimum cost subgraph that connects at least $k$ demand pairs. In this paper, we give an $O(\min\{\sqrt{n},\sqrt{k}\})$-approximation algorithm for $k$-forest, improving on the previous best ratio of $O(n^{2/3}\log n)$ by Segev & Segev. We then apply our algorithm for k-forest to obtain approximation algorithms for several Dial-a-Ride problems. The basic Dial-a-Ride problem is the following: given an $n$ point metric space with $m$ objects each with its own source and destination, and a vehicle capable of carrying at most $k$ objects at any time, find the minimum length tour that uses this vehicle to move each object from its source to destination. We prove that an $α$-approximation algorithm for the $k$-forest problem implies an $O(α\cdot\log^2n)$-approximation algorithm for Dial-a-Ride. Using our results for $k$-forest, we get an $O(\min\{\sqrt{n},\sqrt{k}\}\cdot\log^2 n)$- approximation algorithm for Dial-a-Ride. The only previous result known for Dial-a-Ride was an $O(\sqrt{k}\log n)$-approximation by Charikar & Raghavachari; our results give a different proof of a similar approximation guarantee--in fact, when the vehicle capacity $k$ is large, we give a slight improvement on their results.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anupam Gupta, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Viswanath Nagarajan, R. Ravi. 2007-07-04. Dial a Ride from k-forest. https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0648

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Near-Optimal Consistency-Robustness Bounds for Non-Clairvoyant Scheduling

We study the problem of characterizing the optimal consistency--robustness tradeoff for single-machine non-clairvoyant scheduling with predicted processing times. For a fixed number of jobs $n$, Wei and Zhang (2020) established a lower bound on the achievable consistency--robustness tradeoff which is known to be tight only in a few restrictive cases, leaving the optimal tradeoff for general $n$ unresolved. A different worst-case-$n$ regime was introduced by Benomar et al. (2025), who applied the former work's construction to show that for $λ\in (0, 1)$, any $(1+λ)$-consistent algorithm must be $1 + Ω(\sqrt{1/λ})$-robust. On the other hand, the best known upper bound gives $(1+λ)$-consistency and $1+O(1/λ)$-robustness, leaving a polynomial gap. In this work, we develop a new lower bound using a multi-stage adversarial construction and a new algorithm that together give a near-optimal characterization of the consistency--robustness tradeoff: for every $n$, our upper bound is within a multiplicative factor $3/2$ of our lower bound, and thus our algorithm is within a multiplicative factor $3/2$ of the online optimal. In particular, our lower bound shows that any $(1+λ)$-consistent algorithm must have robustness at least $1/\sqrtλ$ as $n \to \infty$, while our algorithm achieves robustness at most $\frac{1}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{5}{4}+1/λ}$ for any $n$, matching the lower bound in the leading term as $λ\downarrow 0$; our upper bound also closes the polynomial gap in the worst-case-$n$ regime. We additionally show how our algorithm can be made error-tolerant, preserving the near-optimal consistency-robustness tradeoff while incurring only slightly degraded performance under bounded prediction errors.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Optimal Labeling Schemes for $Γ$-Free Matrices

We study labeling schemes for $p \times q$ $Γ$-free binary matrices, which do not contain a submatrix of the form $Γ= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$. We give a labeling scheme that uses $O(\log^2 N)$-bit labels for rows and columns, where $N=p+q$, such that any matrix entry can be determined from the corresponding two labels in constant time in the word RAM model. The worst-case label size matches the counting lower bound up to constant factors. We also show that the entrywise least $Γ$-free supermatrix of an arbitrary $p\times q$ binary matrix, together with its labels, can be constructed in $O(pq)$ time. Our construction represents a $Γ$-free matrix by a sequence of rooted forests, where each column corresponds to a node and the $1$-entries of each row form a root path in its corresponding forest. For $n$-vertex strongly chordal and chordal bipartite graphs, our result gives asymptotically optimal $O(\log^2 n)$-bit adjacency labeling schemes with constant-time queries. These results answer both representation questions posed by Spinrad in 1995.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

On the Largest Cardinality Subset Sum

We study Largest Cardinality Subset Sum (LCSS): given $n$ nonnegative integers and a target $t$, compute a subset summing to $t$ with maximum cardinality. We also consider its all-targets version (ATLCSS), which asks for this maximum for every sum $s\in\{1,\ldots,t\}$. The LCSS problem sits squarely between the subset sum and the knapsack problem. A straightforward dynamic-programming algorithm runs in time $O(nt)$ and solves ATLCSS, and using Jin and Bringmann (both in STOC 2024, independent work) $0$-$1$ knapsack results we achieve a $\widetilde{O}(n + a_{\max}^2)$-time deterministic algorithm for LCSS. Our main result is a randomized $\widetilde{O}(n+\sqrt{n}\,t)$-time algorithm for LCSS. Then, we complement this result with a randomized $\widetilde{O}(n+t^{3/2})$-time algorithm for ATLCSS. Together, our two algorithms give a $\widetilde{O}(n+t\min\{\sqrt{n},\sqrt{t}\})$-time algorithm for LCSS. As an application of ATLCSS, we solve the search version of Projection Subset Sum, introduced by Dutta and Rajasree (SYNSAC 2023), in $\widetilde{O}(n+t^{3/2})$ time for every fixed $\ell_p$ norm with $p\geq 1$. For $\ell_1$, we obtain $\widetilde{O}(n+t)$ time, removing the unique-representation assumption required by their algorithm. Both algorithms output an optimal modified vector and a witnessing subset.

cs.DS↗