Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0707.3442

Combined Sum of Squares Penalties for Molecular Divergence Time Estimation

Abstract

Estimates of molecular divergence times when rates of evolution vary require the assumption of a model of rate change. Brownian motion is one such model, and since rates cannot become negative, a log Brownian model seems appropriate. Divergence time estimates can then be made using weighted least squares penalties. As sequences become long, this approach effectively becomes equivalent to penalized likelihood or Bayesian approaches. Different forms of the least squares penalty are considered to take into account correlation due to shared ancestors. It is shown that a scale parameter is also needed since the sum of squares changes with the scale of time. Errors or uncertainty on fossil calibrations, may be folded in with errors due to the stochastic nature of Brownian motion and ancestral polymorphism, giving a total sum of squares to be minimized. Applying these methods to placental mammal data the estimated age of the root decreases from 125 to about 94 mybp. However, multiple fossil calibration points and relative molecular divergence times inflate the sum of squares more than expected. If fossil data are also bootstrapped, then the confidence interval for the root of placental mammals varies widely from ~70 to 130 mybp. Such a wide interval suggests that more and better fossil calibration data is needed and/or better models of rate evolution are needed and/or better molecular data are needed. Until these issues are thoroughly investigated, it is premature to declare either the old molecular dates frequently obtained (e.g. > 110 mybp) or the lack of identified placental fossils in the Cretaceous, more indicative of when crown-group placental mammals evolved.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter J. Waddell, Prasanth Kalakota. 2007-07-23. Combined Sum of Squares Penalties for Molecular Divergence Time Estimation. https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.3442

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A minimal model for rate-induced tipping to extinction

Rate-induced tipping ("R-tipping") in ecological modelling is characterised by too-rapid change of an environmental parameter causing collapse of a population without any bifurcation being crossed ("B-tipping"). A well-known example of a slow-fast predator-prey model in which R-tipping is observed [Vanselow, Wieczorek, Feudel, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 479, 64-72 (2019)] suffers from unecological "resurgence", whereby populations driven to functional extinction recover towards stable coexistence. We propose an analytically tractable model, incorporating a strong Allee effect into the prey dynamics in a slow-fast Lotka-Volterra-type predator-prey system, which induces bistability and thus renders the extinction state a genuine attractor. Applying geometric singular perturbation theory (GSPT), we describe the dynamics of the extended model that is obtained by "ramping" of the inverse prey carrying capacity. We show the presence of a parabolic-shaped, folded critical manifold which admits a folded saddle singularity, the strong canard of which separates solutions that track the moving coexistence state from those that tip to extinction. The analytical simplicity of our model allows us to derive explicit expressions for the critical rate that separates "tracking" from "tipping" dynamics. Finally, we argue that our system represents a minimal model for rate-induced tipping to extinction, in that it incorporates three essential ingredients: bistability, a folded critical manifold, and a folded-saddle-type canard.

q-bio.PE↗

Cumulants, Moments and Selection

We first describe a fundamental connection between cumulants/moments and selection -- which follows intuitively when heterogeneity is added to Matlthus's population model. In doing so we provide an intuitive explanation of cumulants widely but incorrectly regarded as having no such interpretation. These fundamental relations are more general than Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection -- allowing for calculation of the standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis of fitness far into the future -- and are also more precise; indeed it becomes clear that Fisher's theorem is incorrect for fitness in the conventional/natural sense. Thanks to the close connection between selection and moments, a simple relation also exists between the moments of fitness and the moments of mutation -- at equilibrium and also over time; many biologically meaningful claims follow as logical consequences with connections to Haldane's load theory and a more general formula for coefficient of variation of fitness.

q-bio.PE↗

Mathematical statistics of wild mammal biomass

Using the recently published global census of the biomass of wild terrestrial mammals, we perform a detailed mathematical statistical analysis of its distribution over $N_s=4795$ species, drawing on tools developed in economics to characterize wealth inequality. We show that the Lorenz curve of the mammal biomass distribution is characterized by a large Gini coefficient $G=0.944$ exceeding the inequality reported for wealth distribution among world countries. This distribution is compared to the predictions of the Wealth Thermalization Hypothesis (WTH), in which species biomass values are treated as energy levels populated according to a Rayleigh-Jeans (RJ) steady-state distribution. We show that an RJ extended spectral model reproduces the real Lorenz and Pareto curves over four orders of magnitude of biomass variation, capturing the strong condensation of biomass among the rare, heavy-bodied species and its near-absence among the vast majority of light-bodied ones. These results extend the WTH framework, previously validated on distributions of human economic origin, to a biological distribution shaped by ecological and evolutionary constraints, and place the extreme rarity of large-bodied mammal species within the same statistical mathematical description as the oligarchic concentration of wealth in human societies. We finally discuss possible ecological mechanisms that may contribute to the observed distribution, including interspecific interactions, food availability, and competition.

q-bio.PE↗