Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0707.4104

Queues, stores, and tableaux

Abstract

Consider the single server queue with an infinite buffer and a FIFO discipline, either of type M/M/1 or Geom/Geom/1. Denote by A the arrival process and by s the services. Assume the stability condition to be satisfied. Denote by D the departure process in equilibrium and by r the time spent by the customers at the very back of the queue. We prove that (D,r) has the same law as (A,s) which is an extension of the classical Burke Theorem. In fact, r can be viewed as the departures from a dual storage model. This duality between the two models also appears when studying the transient behavior of a tandem by means of the RSK algorithm: the first and last row of the resulting semi-standard Young tableau are respectively the last instant of departure in the queue and the total number of departures in the store.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Moez Draief, Jean Mairesse, Neil O'Connell. 2007-07-27. Queues, stores, and tableaux. https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.4104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Computing the Helly Number, Radon Number and Rank in Cycle Convexity

In this paper, we investigate three fundamental convexity parameters of graphs under cycle convexity, namely the Helly number, Radon number, and rank. We first study the computational complexity of these parameters. For each of these parameters, we consider the associated threshold decision problem of determining whether the parameter of a given graph is at least a prescribed integer. We establish that all three problems are $\NP$-hard and $\W[1]$-hard when parameterized by the threshold. Moreover, we strengthen these results by showing that the $\NP$-hardness persists even when the input is restricted to planar graphs of maximum degree at most $6$. We also focus on the structural properties of connected graphs corresponding to extremal values of these parameters. In particular, we characterize the graph classes for which the three parameters attain the values $n-1$ and $n-2$, where $n$ is the order of $G$.

cs.DM↗

Objective Transfer in Single-Node Network Criticality: Optimal Constants and Exact Separation Thresholds

When a vertex is selected as the most damaging single attack target under one damage objective, how much of the optimal damage under a different objective does it retain? We study this for the three objectives commonly used in critical node detection -- pairwise connectivity (PC), size of the largest surviving component (LCC) and number of components (NC) -- for single-vertex attacks on connected graphs, with the attacked vertex counted in the damage and ties resolved optimistically. For the pair PC, LCC the loss is bounded: a PC-optimal vertex retains at least a $2-\sqrt2$ fraction of the optimal LCC damage, an LCC-optimal vertex at least 2/3 of the optimal PC damage, and both constants are best possible. Neither bound depends on the choice among tied optimal vertices or on whether the attacked vertex is counted, and both remain valid as lower bounds for attack sets of any fixed size. For the four directions involving NC no positive constant exists; explicit families have ratios decaying like 1/k, and no single attack set retains a positive fraction of all three optima uniformly. We also determine the smallest orders at which the sets of optimal vertices become disjoint: 7 for LCC/NC, 8 for PC/NC, 9 for PC/LCC and 11 for all three pairwise, with trees realising the triple separation for every n>=11; these values rest on an exhaustive enumeration of the 11,989,762 connected graphs with 3<=n<=10. Finally, the most critical vertex in a Birnbaum-type sense may depend on the failure probability: a six-vertex graph, of smallest possible order, changes leader once, at $p^*=3-\sqrt5$. Adding universal vertices lifts the budget-one examples to every fixed budget, so over all connected graphs the same constants are optimal at every fixed budget; behaviour within restricted classes such as trees is left open.

cs.DM↗

Complexity, approximation, and extension of proper $\{a,b\}$-edge-weightings

For distinct integers $a$ and $b$, an $\{a,b\}$-edge-weighting assigns $a$ or $b$ to each edge and labels each vertex by the sum of its incident weights. Such a weighting is proper if adjacent vertices receive distinct labels. We prove that, for every fixed pair of distinct integers, deciding whether a proper weighting exists is NP-complete even for simple cubic planar graphs. On planar multigraphs with $m$ edges, we give an exact $2^{O(\sqrt m)}$-time algorithm and, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), exclude $2^{o(\sqrt m)}$-time algorithms even for simple cubic planar graphs. As a consequence, locally irregular $2$-edge-coloring is NP-complete on simple cubic planar graphs, admits a deterministic $2^{O(\sqrt n)}$-time algorithm on $n$-vertex graphs in this class, and admits no $2^{o(\sqrt n)}$-time algorithm under ETH. For maximizing the number of edges joining vertices with distinct labels, we give a deterministic efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS) on planar multigraphs, a polynomial-time $1/2$-approximation on multigraphs, and APX-completeness even on simple cubic graphs. Extending a partial $\{a,b\}$-edge-weighting to a proper one is NP-complete for every fixed pair even on simple cubic planar bipartite graphs, while it is polynomial-time solvable on trees. The hardness persists even when the prescribed edges form disjoint paths of length $6$ and all edges of each path have the same prescribed weight.

cs.DM↗