Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 0708.2545

Complexity of the Minimum Cost Homomorphism Problem for Semicomplete Digraphs with Possible Loops

Abstract

For digraphs $D$ and $H$, a mapping $f: V(D)\dom V(H)$ is a homomorphism of $D$ to $H$ if $uv\in A(D)$ implies $f(u)f(v)\in A(H).$ For a fixed digraph $H$, the homomorphism problem is to decide whether an input digraph $D$ admits a homomorphism to $H$ or not, and is denoted as HOM($H$). An optimization version of the homomorphism problem was motivated by a real-world problem in defence logistics and was introduced in \cite{gutinDAM154a}. If each vertex $u \in V(D)$ is associated with costs $c_i(u), i \in V(H)$, then the cost of the homomorphism $f$ is $\sum_{u\in V(D)}c_{f(u)}(u)$. For each fixed digraph $H$, we have the {\em minimum cost homomorphism problem for} $H$ and denote it as MinHOM($H$). The problem is to decide, for an input graph $D$ with costs $c_i(u),$ $u \in V(D), i\in V(H)$, whether there exists a homomorphism of $D$ to $H$ and, if one exists, to find one of minimum cost. Although a complete dichotomy classification of the complexity of MinHOM($H$) for a digraph $H$ remains an unsolved problem, complete dichotomy classifications for MinHOM($H$) were proved when $H$ is a semicomplete digraph \cite{gutinDAM154b}, and a semicomplete multipartite digraph \cite{gutinDAM}. In these studies, it is assumed that the digraph $H$ is loopless. In this paper, we present a full dichotomy classification for semicomplete digraphs with possible loops, which solves a problem in \cite{gutinRMS}.\footnote{This paper was submitted to SIAM J. Discrete Math. on October 27, 2006}

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E. J. Kim, G. Gutin. 2007-08-19. Complexity of the Minimum Cost Homomorphism Problem for Semicomplete Digraphs with Possible Loops. https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.2545

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Probabilistic Methods on Erdos Problems

Probability distributions and the rules of inclusion-exclusion apply to derive general results about graph theory and number theory. In order to apply the rules of inclusion-exclusion in the setting some of these problems require, it is necessary to use specific equations and make several assumptions about integration and measure of the probability distributions.

cs.DM↗

Almost every Boolean function has central threshold degree

The polynomial threshold degree (or threshold degree) of a Boolean function is the least degree of a real polynomial whose sign represents it. We prove that almost every Boolean function has polynomial threshold degree among the central one or two integers. More precisely, a uniformly chosen Boolean function on $n$ variables has threshold degree either $\lfloor n/2\rfloor$ or $\lceil n/2\rceil$, except with probability at most $\exp(-c2^{n/2}/n)$, for an absolute constant $c>0$ and all sufficiently large $n$. The paper proves a 1991 conjecture of Aspnes, Beigel, Furst and Rudich. It also proves a 1991 conjecture of Wang and Williams for even $n$ and its main concentration assertion for odd $n$. A parity example gives a lower bound on the exceptional probability whose exponent differs from ours by a factor of order $n$. The proof relates polynomial sign representation to recovery of Reed--Muller codes from random erasures, and combines sharp-threshold estimates with bounds on generalized Hamming weights and minimum distance.

cs.DM↗

Near-Optimal Bounds for Testing k-Colorability

We study the sample complexity of testing $k$-colorability in the dense graph model. A graph is $\varepsilon$-far from being $k$-colorable if at least $\varepsilon n^2$ edge deletions are required to make it $k$-colorable. We prove that, for every integer $k\ge 2$, a uniformly random induced subgraph on \[ O\!\left(\frac{k\log k}{\varepsilon}\right) \] vertices is non-$k$-colorable with probability at least $2/3$ whenever the original graph is $\varepsilon$-far from $k$-colorable. The proof introduces a trial coloring process based on nested palette systems and iteratively selected pivots. This yields an upper bound of $O(k\log k/\varepsilon)$, which is no worse than the previous state of the art $O(k\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon)$ throughout the nonvacuous parameter range, and is an improvement whenever $1/\varepsilon$ is superpolynomial in $k$. Moreover, for every fixed $k$, our bound matches the known lower bound, thereby establishing the optimal $Θ(1/\varepsilon)$ dependence on $\varepsilon$ and, to the best of our knowledge, achieving this optimal dependence for the first time.

cs.DM↗