Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0709.1086

Flux saturation number of superconducting rings

D. V. Denisov·D. V. Shantsev·Y. M. Galperin·T. H. Johansen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The distributions of electrical current and magnetic field in a thin-film superconductor ring is calculated by solving the London equation. The maximum amount of flux trapped by the hole, the fluxoid saturation number, is obtained by limiting the current density by the depairing current. The results are compare it with similar results derived for the bulk case of a long hollow cylinder [Nordborg & Vinokur, Phys. Rev. B 62, 12408 (2000)]. In the limit of small holes our result reduces to the Pearl solution for an isolated vortex in a thin film. For large hole radius, the ratio between saturation numbers in bulk and film superconductors is proportional to the square root of the hole size.

Explore related subjects

cond-mat.supr-con

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D. V. Denisov, D. V. Shantsev, Y. M. Galperin, T. H. Johansen. 2007-11-06. Flux saturation number of superconducting rings. https://arxiv.org/abs/0709.1086

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Evanescent-wave Johnson Noise from Superconductors

We compute the evanescent-wave Johnson noise (EWJN) in the vacuum half-space above a superconductor, and the resulting relaxation time ($T_1$) of spin and charge qubits placed at nanometer distances from the surface. The electromagnetic response is described by a single microscopic transverse current-response kernel $Q(q, ω)$ for a BCS superconductor. This is computed for varying densities of both non-magnetic impurities and magnetic impurities, for arbitrary frequency and temperature and for wave vectors $q \ll k_F$ (the Fermi wavevector). When combined with the fluctuation-dissipation theorem and the nonlocal surface impedances of the half-space, this yields the magnetic and electric field noise at any distance $z \gg k_F^{-1}$ from the surface, from which we obtain $T_1$. Just below $T_c$ the magnetic noise is enhanced relative to the normal state by the coherence (Hebel-Slichter-type) peak of the dissipative conductivity and drops exponentially at lower temperatures; the electric noise shows no coherence peak. The theory predicts that there is a zero-temperature noise floor induced by magnetic impurities. In the gapless regime produced by pair breaking, the finite subgap density of states $ν(0)$ yields a temperature-independent noise spectral density and a relaxation rate bounded by $T_1^{-1}(T)\le[ν(0)/ν_F]^{2}\,T_{1,N}^{-1}(T)$ for $T\ll T_c$, with equality in the extreme nonlocal regime. Here $ν(0)$ and $ν_F$ are the superconducting and normal-state densities of states at the Fermi energy, and $T_{1,N}(T)$ is the relaxation time the same electrode would produce in its normal state at the same temperature.

cond-mat.supr-con↗
arXiv2026

Reversible field-free superconducting diode effect controlled by an antiferromagnet

The semiconductor diode, which allows current to flow preferentially in one direction, is a fundamental building block of numerous modern electronic circuits. Its superconducting analogue---the superconducting diode effect---enables directional dissipationless current flow and may provide similar functionality in future superconducting quantum circuits. Realization of such a nonreciprocal supercurrent requires broken time-reversal symmetry. At zero applied field, this has been typically associated either with intrinsic unconventional superconductivity or extrinsic spin-split electronic states induced by magnetic proximity. Here we demonstrate a field-free superconducting diode effect in conventional superconducting Al proximitized by collinear antiferromagnetic CuMnAs, whose electronic structure breaks time-reversal symmetry without generating spin splitting. By tuning the proximity effect through an insulating AlAs interlayer and correlating the reversal of the diode polarity with the reversal of the remanent Néel state, we establish that the antiferromagnet controls the superconducting diode effect. Our results show that neither spin-split bands nor net magnetization is required for a magnetically controlled field-free superconducting diode effect, extending superconducting nonreciprocity to a broader class of collinear compensated magnets.

cond-mat.supr-con↗
arXiv2026

Anisotropic interface-confined superconductivity in FeTe-based heterostructures

Interface-confined superconductivity emerges from the interaction of electronic states across chemically distinct boundaries, providing a route to engineer superconducting phases where magnetism and topology coexist. Determining the intrinsic nature of such superconductivity, however, is challenging because the superconducting layer is only a few nanometers thick and buried beneath several normal layers. Here, we measure the whole-sample Meissner response of six $\mathrm{FeTe}$-based heterostructures in a uniform magnetic field using a frequency-domain tunnel-diode resonator. In the ultrathin limit, the conventional normalization of the measured susceptibility, $χ(T\to0)=-1$, fails by tens of percent. We establish the appropriate calibration and invert $χ(T)$ to determine the London penetration depth $λ(T)$. Two key results emerge. First, the broad transitions observed in $χ(T)$ arise naturally from the extreme geometry and large $λ$, without requiring chemical or structural inhomogeneity; the extracted $λ(T)$ closely tracks the resistive transition. Second, $λ(T)$ and the corresponding superfluid density are inconsistent with a fully gapped isotropic $s$-wave state and instead indicate a strongly anisotropic order parameter possibly with line nodes or deep gap minima. The inferred $λ(0)$ is of order $1\,μ$m, consistent with an independent analysis of the 2D phase stiffness. Despite the distinct chemical, magnetic, and topological character of the three overlayers, all six FeTe heterostructures exhibit similar low-temperature power-law behavior, with no systematic dependence of the superconducting response on overlayer identity. These results point to the interfacial $\mathrm{FeTe}$ layer as the common origin of superconductivity.

cond-mat.supr-con↗