Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 0711.2989

Gravitational Softening and Adaptive Mass Resolution

Abstract

Pairwise forces between particles in cosmological N-body simulations are generally softened to avoid hard collisions. Physically, this softening corresponds to treating the particles as diffuse clouds rather than point masses. For particles of unequal mass (and hence unequal softening length), computing the softened force involves a nontrivial double integral over the volumes of the two particles. We show that Plummer force softening is consistent with this interpretation of softening while spline softening is not. We provide closed-form expressions and numerical implementation for pairwise gravitational force laws for pairs of particles of general softening scales $ε_1$ and $ε_2$ assuming the commonly used cloud profiles: NGP, CIC, TSC, and PQS. Similarly, we generalize Plummer force law into pairs of particles of general softenings. We relate our expressions to the gaussian, Plummer and spline force softenings known from literature. Our expressions allow possible inclusions of pointlike particles such as stars or supermassive black holes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexander Shirokov. 2008-04-09. Gravitational Softening and Adaptive Mass Resolution. https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2989

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Multiwavelength evidence of the physical processes in radio jets

Over the last few years, high-quality X-ray imaging and spectroscopic data from Chandra and XMM-Newton have added greatly to the understanding of the physics of radio jets. Here we describe the current state of knowledge with an emphasis on the underlying physics used to interpret multiwavelength data in terms of physical parameters.

astro-ph

The X-ray Jets of Active Galaxies

Jet physics is again flourishing as a result of Chandra's ability to resolve high-energy emission from the radio-emitting structures of active galaxies and separate it from the X-ray-emitting thermal environments of the jets. These enhanced capabilities have coincided with an increasing interest in the link between the growth of super-massive black holes and galaxies, and an appreciation of the likely importance of jets in feedback processes. I review the progress that has been made using Chandra and XMM-Newton observations of jets and the medium in which they propagate, addressing several important questions, including: Are the radio structures in a state of minimum energy? Do powerful large-scale jets have fast spinal speeds? What keeps jets collimated? Where and how does particle acceleration occur? What is jet plasma made of? What does X-ray emission tell us about the dynamics and energetics of radio plasma/gas interactions? Is a jet's fate determined by the central engine?

astro-ph

The Outward Radial Offset of Neptune Ring Arcs

The designation of the customary restricted three-body disturbing potential $Φ$ as the perturbation Hamiltonian is believed to be the cause of Neptune ring arcs' radial offset between theories and observations. To identify the appropriate perturbation Hamiltonian, the energy integral in the fixed frame of a restricted three-body system, consisting of the central, primary, and test bodies, is reconsidered. It is shown that the perturbation energy includes the disturbing potential $Φ$ and the potential arising from the angular momentum terms of the test body. Both potentials happen to be singular as the test body goes to infinity contradicting to the perturbation nature. These two potentials can be combined to an energy relevant disturbing potential $Φ^{*}=βΦ$ which is regular at infinity because of the cancellation of the singularities. For circular orbits of the primary, the energy equation is conservative, and $Φ^{*}$ is identified as the perturbation Hamiltonian. Applying this result to evaluate the backgrund effect of Triton to the arc-Galatea system of Neptune, it is shown that there is a small difference $ΔΦ=(Φ^{*}-Φ)$ which amounts to an outward radial offset of the corotation location of Galatea by 0.3 Km. The mismatch between the pattern speed of Galatea's corotation potential and the mean motion velocity of the arcs could be resolved by considering the finite mass of Fraternite. However, by using $Φ^{*}$, Galatea's eccentricity could be reassessed in terms of the mass of Fraternite.

astro-ph