What Did Fisher Mean by An Estimate?

Esa Uusipaikka

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 0807.3397

What Did Fisher Mean by An Estimate?

Esa Uusipaikka

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Fisher's Method of Maximum Likelihood is shown to be a procedure for the construction of likelihood intervals or regions, instead of a procedure of point estimation. Based on Fisher's articles and books it is justified that by estimation Fisher meant the construction of likelihood intervals or regions from appropriate likelihood function and that an estimate is a statistic, that is, a function from a sample space to a parameter space such that the likelihood function obtained from the sampling distribution of the statistic at the observed value of the statistic is used to construct likelihood intervals or regions. Thus Problem of Estimation is how to choose the 'best' estimate. Fisher's solution for the problem of estimation is Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE). Fisher's Theory of Statistical Estimation is a chain of ideas used to justify MLE as the solution of the problem of estimation. The construction of confidence intervals by the delta method from the asymptotic normal distribution of MLE is based on Fisher's ideas, but is against his 'logic of statistical inference'. Instead the construction of confidence intervals from the profile likelihood function of a given interest function of the parameter vector is considered as a solution more in line with Fisher's 'ideology'. A new method of calculation of profile likelihood-based confidence intervals for general smooth interest functions in general statistical models is considered.

Explore related subjects

math.ST stat.TH

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Esa Uusipaikka. 2008-07-22. What Did Fisher Mean by An Estimate?. https://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3397

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Scale Invariance Property of PCA

The PCA algorithm is sensitive to changes in measurement scale. Measuring one variable of a system in inches rather than centimeters, say, alters both its principal axes and principal eigenvalues. Although this scale dependence is generally complicated, we show here that it nevertheless obeys a strict invariance property: under a continuous scale adjustment, the initial state's $k$-th largest principal component (ordered by eigenvalue) continuously evolves into the final state's $k$-th largest principal component, for each $k$. In this sense, we can say that the modes of PCA are "order-stable" with respect to changes in measurement scale. A special case occurs when scaling along directions that are orthogonal to some modes. Here, apparent eigenvalue crossings can occur. However, we show that we can interpret these apparent crossings as cases where the modes instantaneously swap their orientation, in this way maintaining the required order stability.

math.ST↗

arXiv2026

Small noise asymptotics for linear parabolic SPDEs in two space dimensions with unknown damping factors

We study parametric estimation for second order linear parabolic stochastic partial differential equations in two space dimensions with a small volatility parameter driven by a $Q$-Wiener process with an unknown damping parameter using high frequency spatio-temporal data. We first provide an estimator for the damping parameter of the $Q$-Wiener process utilizing realized quadratic variations based on spatial and temporal increments. We next propose minimum contrast estimators of the diffusive and advective parameters in the SPDE using a contrast function with the proposed estimator of the damping parameter. We then construct a quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of the reaction parameter in the SPDE using the approximate coordinate process derived from the estimators of the diffusive and advective parameters. We also provide simulation results of the proposed estimators.

math.ST↗

arXiv2026

Spike Estimation from Heteroscedastic Noise via Random Splitting

In this paper, we consider a spiked Wigner type matrix with a heteroscedastic and unknown variance profile. It is well known that in the supercritical regime of the BBP transition, strong spikes can create outliers in the spectrum. Unfortunately, in the heteroscedastic case, in general it is not possible to estimate the spike strength from these observed outlier consistently, as the latter is a solution to a Dyson equation with unknown parameters from the variance profile. In this paper, inspired by the work on sparse matrix completion \citep{BordenaveCosteNadakuditi2023}, we introduce an asymmetrized model by randomly splitting the spiked matrix into two parts, which transforms the noisy Wigner type matrix into a non Hermitian random matrix, while preserving the Hermitian spikes at the cost of a dilution. We establish a BBP type transition for the asymmetrized model, from which we can estimate the strength of the spikes precisely, even without knowing the variance profile of the noise part. We then further apply our approach to study the correlation between two correlated spiked models, where the spike/signal parts of the two models are correlated, and the noise parts are independent but may both be heteroscedastic. By applying our asymmetrization approach to the two models separately and also jointly, we are able to obtain a precise estimate of the correlation between the signal parts of the two models.

math.ST↗