arXiv · 0910.3529
Citation Statistics
Abstract
This is a report about the use and misuse of citation data in the assessment of scientific research. The idea that research assessment must be done using ``simple and objective'' methods is increasingly prevalent today. The ``simple and objective'' methods are broadly interpreted as bibliometrics, that is, citation data and the statistics derived from them. There is a belief that citation statistics are inherently more accurate because they substitute simple numbers for complex judgments, and hence overcome the possible subjectivity of peer review. But this belief is unfounded.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Robert Adler, John Ewing, Peter Taylor. 2009-10-19. Citation Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-sts285
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.