Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1001.1654

Algorithmic Differentiation of Linear Algebra Functions with Application in Optimum Experimental Design (Extended Version)

S. F. Walter·L. Lehmann
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We derive algorithms for higher order derivative computation of the rectangular $QR$ and eigenvalue decomposition of symmetric matrices with distinct eigenvalues in the forward and reverse mode of algorithmic differentiation (AD) using univariate Taylor propagation of matrices (UTPM). Linear algebra functions are regarded as elementary functions and not as algorithms. The presented algorithms are implemented in the BSD licensed AD tool \texttt{ALGOPY}. Numerical tests show that the UTPM algorithms derived in this paper produce results close to machine precision accuracy. The theory developed in this paper is applied to compute the gradient of an objective function motivated from optimum experimental design: $\nabla_x \Phi(C(J(F(x,y))))$, where $\Phi = \{\lambda_1 : \lambda_1 C\}$, $C = (J^T J)^{-1}$, $J = \frac{\dd F}{\dd y}$ and $F = F(x,y)$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.MScs.NAmath.NA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

S. F. Walter, L. Lehmann. 2010-01-11. Algorithmic Differentiation of Linear Algebra Functions with Application in Optimum Experimental Design (Extended Version). https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1654

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗