Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1001.3551

A framework for adaptive Monte-Carlo procedures

Bernard Lapeyre·Jérôme Lelong
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Adaptive Monte Carlo methods are recent variance reduction techniques. In this work, we propose a mathematical setting which greatly relaxes the assumptions needed by for the adaptive importance sampling techniques presented by Vazquez-Abad and Dufresne, Fu and Su, and Arouna. We establish the convergence and asymptotic normality of the adaptive Monte Carlo estimator under local assumptions which are easily verifiable in practice. We present one way of approximating the optimal importance sampling parameter using a randomly truncated stochastic algorithm. Finally, we apply this technique to some examples of valuation of financial derivatives.

Explore related subjects

q-fin.CPmath.PR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bernard Lapeyre, Jérôme Lelong. 2010-07-08. A framework for adaptive Monte-Carlo procedures. https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma.2011.002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SPX-VIX Risk Computations Via Perturbed Optimal Transport

We propose a model independent framework for generating SPX and VIX risk scenarios based on a joint optimal transport calibration of their market smiles. Starting from the entropic martingale optimal transport formulation of Guyon, we introduce a perturbation methodology that computes sensitivities of the calibrated coupling using a Fisher information linearization. This allows risk to be generated without performing a full recalibration after market shocks. We further introduce a dimension reduction method based on perturbed optimal transport that produces fast and stable risk estimates while preserving the structural properties of the calibrated model. The approach is combined with Skew Stickiness Ratio(SSR) dynamics to translate SPX shocks into perturbations of forward variance and VIX distributions. Numerical experiments show that the proposed method produces accurate risk estimates relative to full recalibration while being computationally much faster. A backtesting study also demonstrates improved hedging performance compared with stochastic local volatility models.

q-fin.CP↗
arXiv2026

Loss Choice or Model Choice? The Role of Forecast Level in Cryptocurrency Volatility Forecasting

Volatility forecasts play a central role in financial risk management because their overall level and day-to-day movements affect downstream decisions. Most studies compare forecasting models while keeping the training loss fixed. Yet losses emphasise different errors and can target different properties of future volatility, so raw comparisons may combine persistent forecast-level differences with differences in daily forecast movements. This leaves unresolved whether the importance of loss choice comes mainly from the forecast level it targets or from differences that remain after level adjustment. We address this gap through a comparison of seven losses and five models across major cryptocurrencies. Validation-based alignment adjusts the forecast level before the raw and aligned forecasts are evaluated using statistical scores and one-day Value-at-Risk. Before alignment, marginal score variation is greater across losses. After alignment, model choice becomes the larger source of variation in the full five-model comparison, while cross-loss differences in VaR breach rates narrow substantially. Our contribution is a comprehensive evaluation of loss and model choice that shows why losses can appear so influential in raw comparisons and how this interpretation changes when forecast level and downstream risk are considered explicitly.

q-fin.CP↗
arXiv2026

CFOs Meet LLMs

Business sentiment is a closely watched economic signal, but measuring it is slow and costly: surveys typically reach only a few hundred firms, arrive periodically, and take time to compile. We show that large language models hold the potential to address these shortcomings. We prompt an LLM to role-play as the CFO of a specific company on a specific date, for every public-company CFO who responded to the Duke--Federal Reserve CFO Survey between 2002 and 2025, and answer a question about economy-wide optimism. The LLM-generated optimism score predicts the individual CFO's actual answer, even in specifications that include firm and year-quarter fixed effects as well as a control variable measuring the human CFO's lagged response. Accuracy increases with the information provided to the LLM, and the relation persists under quarterly aggregation. We find the same patterns hold for two other questions measuring CFO expectations: the respondent's optimism about their own firm and their expectation of own-firm revenues. With appropriate conditioning, LLMs may in the future be able to serve as digital twins of executives, offering scalable, high-frequency expectations data for financial research and policy.

q-fin.CP↗