arXiv · 1003.3977
Normalization, CWTS indicators, and the Leiden Rankings: Differences in citation behavior at the level of fields
Abstract
Van Raan et al. (2010; arXiv:1003.2113) have proposed a new indicator (MNCS) for field normalization. Since field normalization is also used in the Leiden Rankings of universities, we elaborate our critique of journal normalization in Opthof & Leydesdorff (2010; arXiv:1002.2769) in this rejoinder concerning field normalization. Fractional citation counting thoroughly solves the issue of normalization for differences in citation behavior among fields. This indicator can also be used to obtain a normalized impact factor.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Loet Leydesdorff, Tobias Opthof. 2010-05-05. Normalization, CWTS indicators, and the Leiden Rankings: Differences in citation behavior at the level of fields. https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3977
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.