Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1004.2016

Evolution of proto-galaxy-clusters to their present form: theory and observations

Carl H. Gibson·Rudy E. Schild
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

From hydro-gravitational-dynamics theory HGD, gravitational structure formation begins 30,000 years (10^12 s) after the turbulent big bang by viscous-gravitational fragmentation into super-cluster-voids and 10^46 kg proto-galaxy-super-clusters. Linear and spiral gas-proto-galaxies GPGs are the smallest fragments to emerge from the plasma epoch at decoupling at 10^13 s with Nomura turbulence morphology and length scale L_N ~ (γν/ ρG)^1/2 ~10^20 m, determined by rate-of-strain γ, photon viscosity ν, and density ρof the plasma fossilized at 10^12 s. GPGs fragment into 10^36 kg proto-globular-star-cluster PGC clumps of 10^24 kg primordial-fog-particle PFP dark matter planets. All stars form from planet mergers, with ~97% unmerged as galaxy baryonic-dark-matter BDM. The non-baryonic-dark-matter NBDM is so weakly collisional it diffuses to form galaxy cluster halos. It does not guide galaxy formation, contrary to conventional cold-dark-matter hierarchical clustering CDMHC theory (Γ=0). NBDM has ~97% of the mass of the universe. It binds rotating clusters of galaxies by gravitational forces. The galaxy rotational spin axis matches that for low wavenumber spherical harmonic components of CMB temperature anomalies and extends to 4.5x10^25 m (1.5 Gpc) in quasar polarization vectors, requiring a big bang turbulence origin. GPGs stick together by frictional processes of the frozen gas planets, just as PGCs have been meta-stable for the 13.7 Gyr age of the universe.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.COgr-qc

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Carl H. Gibson, Rudy E. Schild. 2010-04-12. Evolution of proto-galaxy-clusters to their present form: theory and observations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.2016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Constraints on the Thomson optical depth to the CMB from the Lyman-$α$ forest

We present the first constraints on the electron optical depth to reionization, $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$, from the Lyman-$α$ forest alone for physically motivated reionization models that match the reionization's end-point, $z_{\rm{end}}$, required by the same astrophysical probe, and for symmetric reionization models with fixed duration, $Δz$, commonly adopted in CMB reionization analyses. Compared to traditional estimates from the latter, the Lyman-$α$ forest traces the ionization state of the IGM through its coupling with the thermal state. We find an explicit mapping between the two solving the chemistry and temperature evolution equations for hydrogen and helium. Our results yield $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$=$0.040^{+0.042}_{-0.018}$ (95\% C.L) and $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$=$0.041^{+0.028}_{-0.017}$ for reionization models with $z_{\rm{end}}$ and $Δz$-fixed, respectively. With mock Lyman-$α$ forest data that mimics the precision of future larger quasar sample datasets, we would potentially obtain tighter $τ_{\mathrm{e}}$ constraints, paving the way for CMB-independent constraints on the epoch of reionization from a large-scale structure probe.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

Non-minimally Coupled Running Curvaton for DESI-motivated Dynamical Dark Energy

Recent DESI BAO data combined with CMB and supernova measurements suggest a dynamical dark energy that can cross the phantom divide. We show that introducing a non-minimal coupling $ξχ^2R$ to the running-curvaton framework allows a single field to drive early-universe curvature perturbations and late-time phantom-crossing cosmic acceleration without ghost instabilities. Using MCMC background likelihoods with DESI DR2 BAO, Pantheon+ SNe, and a reduced CMB prior, we constrain the cosmological parameters: $H_0 = 67.88^{+0.53}_{-0.61}\,{\rm km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}}$, $Ω_m = 0.3072^{+0.0059}_{-0.0054}$, $w_0 = -0.922^{+0.055}_{-0.063}$, and $w_a = -0.205^{+0.173}_{-0.182}$. Parameter degeneracies leave the coupling constants weakly constrained, highlighting the need for full perturbation-level analysis using CMB spectra and lensing.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Relation Between Field-Level Posteriors, Correlators, and their Likelihoods

We develop a field-level posterior for cosmological data by marginalizing over initial conditions and noise in a general forward model. While our focus is on large-scale structure data, the results generalize to any weakly non-Gaussian observable. Moreover, the construction is non-perturbative with respect to the forward model and applies equally well to perturbative calculations, simulation-based predictions, and more general effective descriptions. Expanding the FLP around its Gaussian limit, we derive a general expression for the Fisher matrix and reorganize the field-level information into contributions associated with the connected correlators of the evolved field. This makes explicit which terms are captured by likelihood analyses based on the power spectrum, the bispectrum, or finite sets of summary statistics, and which are lost under compression. We recover the standard Gaussian-covariance result for the power spectrum, show that the Gaussian bispectrum likelihood reproduces the corresponding field-level contribution, and show how cross-covariances among summaries progressively reconstruct more of the full field-level information. As an application to the BAO scale, we show how the field contains all the information required for its optimal reconstruction in the presence of noise, and identify the contributions in the FLP needed to attain this limit. We also show that the reconstruction of the initial field arises naturally as a byproduct of our approach, yielding the optimal estimate of the initial conditions given the data and the noise. Our results provide a unified framework to compare field-level and correlator-based inference, to quantify the information loss induced by compression, and to explore the role of stochasticity.

astro-ph.CO↗