arXiv · 1007.4281
EPR, Bell, and Quantum Locality
Abstract
Maudlin has claimed that no local theory can reproduce the predictions of standard quantum mechanics that violate Bell's inequality for Bohm's version (two spin-half particles in a singlet state) of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen problem. It is argued that, on the contrary, standard quantum mechanics itself is a counterexample to Maudlin's claim, because it is local in the appropriate sense (measurements at one place do not influence what occurs elsewhere there) when formulated using consistent principles in place of the inconsistent appeals to "measurement" found in current textbooks. This argument sheds light on the claim of Blaylock that counterfactual definiteness is an essential ingredient in derivations of Bell's inequality.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Robert B. Griffiths. 2010-07-24. EPR, Bell, and Quantum Locality. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3606371
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.