Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1009.4142

About the Justification of Experience Rating: Bonus Malus System and a new Poisson Mixture Model

Abstract

The claim experience of the past is a very important information to calculate the fair price of an insurance contract. In a lot of European countries for instance the prices for motor car insurance depend on the number of claims the driver has reported to the insurance company during the last years. Classically these prices are calculated on the basis of a mixed Poisson model with a gamma mixing distribution. The mixing distribution models the car drivers' qualities across the insured portfolio. This is just one example for experience rating. In the classical context the price is equal to the expectation of the Bayesian posterior distribution. In some lines of business (especially third party liability and lines with exposure to extreme weather events) we that the real world data cannot be described well enough by the classical Poisson - gamma model. Therefore we investigate the influence of the mixing distribution on the posterior distribution conditional on the experienced number of claims. This enables the application of other - more risk adequate premium principles than the expectation principle. We introduce the inverse - gamma distribution as a new mixing distribution to model claim numbers and compare it to the classical gamma distribution. In both cases a closed analytic representation of the mixed distribution can be found: In the classic case the well known negative binomial distribution, in our new one a representation using the Bessel functions. Additionally we present numerical results about the tail behaviour of the mixed Poisson - inverse - gamma distribution. Finally we introduce the concept of resolution. It enables us to decide if the classification of risk groups via the number of experienced claims is a risk adequate procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Magda Schiegl. 2010-09-21. About the Justification of Experience Rating: Bonus Malus System and a new Poisson Mixture Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4142

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Dynamic reinsurance via martingale transport

We formulate a dynamic reinsurance problem in which the insurer seeks to satisfy prescribed terminal moment or risk-based constraints while minimizing the $L^2$-norm of the ceded risk. As a tool for this analysis, we first use techniques from martingale optimal transport to study the auxiliary problem in which the insurer matches a given terminal distribution of the surplus process. We show that, under suitable assumptions, this auxiliary problem admits a tractable solution analogous to the Bass martingale. We then relax this condition by only requiring certain moment or risk-based constraints.

q-fin.RM

Risk Measures under Paired-Ambiguity: A Deep Learning Reflected BSDE Framework

We study optimal stopping under dynamic risk measures with simultaneous ambiguity in the probability model and the discount rate. We introduce a paired ambiguity framework combining Girsanov model uncertainty with cash subadditive risk evaluation and characterize the stopping value by an upper reflected backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE). We establish structural properties of the resulting stopping operator and study quadratic drivers associated with entropic risk measures, obtaining explicit stopping rules in several benchmark cases. We then develop a deep learning scheme for the reflected quadratic BSDE. The convergence analysis uses discrete reflection and truncation to reduce the quadratic problem to a globally Lipschitz system and combines reflected BSDE discretization estimates with neural network approximation errors. Numerical experiments for American options illustrate the effects of discount rate and entropic ambiguity on stopping values and exercise decisions.

q-fin.RM

When Is the Gini Loading More Prudent? Tail Structure and the Ordering of the Standard Deviation and the Gini Mean Difference

The standard deviation (SD) and the Gini mean difference (GMD) are the two canonical measures of variability used to load premiums, set risk margins and allocate capital, yet no universal ordering between them exists. We show that the comparison is \emph{equivalent} to asking whether the coefficient of variation of the spacing $|X-X'|$ generated by two independent copies of the risk exceeds unity, so that the exponential law -- whose spacing is again exponential -- is the universal knife-edge separating the two regimes. Reading the GMD as twice the maxiance, that is, as a second-order \emph{dual} moment in the sense of Yaari's dual theory, the problem becomes an explicit comparison of primal and dual second-order variability. We derive a closed-form representation of the mean excess function of the spacing in terms of the hazard and reverse hazard rates of $X$, and use it to prove that heavy-tailed behavior -- a decreasing hazard rate or an increasing reverse hazard rate -- yields SD dominance, whereas two-sided light tails yield GMD dominance; within the monotone aging classes, equality characterizes the exponential law. Both regimes are stable under truncation, convolution and mixing, which makes them operational in collective risk and frailty models. We classify the severity, lifetime and frequency distributions of actuarial practice accordingly, quantify the consequences for SD- and Gini-loaded premium principles and for Gini-type tail risk measures, and show that the sign of $\mathrm{SD}-\mathrm{GMD}$ across thresholds furnishes a simple diagnostic for tail aging.

q-fin.RM