Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1010.1764

Improved complexity bounds for real root isolation using Continued Fractions

Abstract

We consider the problem of isolating the real roots of a square-free polynomial with integer coefficients using (variants of) the continued fraction algorithm (CF). We introduce a novel way to compute a lower bound on the positive real roots of univariate polynomials. This allows us to derive a worst case bound of $\sOB(d^6 + d^4τ^2 + d^3τ^2)$ for isolating the real roots of a polynomial with integer coefficients using the classic variant of CF, where $d$ is the degree of the polynomial and $τ$ the maximum bitsize of its coefficients. This improves the previous bound by Sharma \cite{sharma-tcs-2008} by a factor of $d^3$ and matches the bound derived by Mehlhorn and Ray \cite{mr-jsc-2009} for another variant of CF; it also matches the worst case bound of the subdivision-based solvers. We present a new variant of CF, we call it iCF, that isolates the real roots of a polynomial with integer coefficients in $\sOB(d^5+d^4τ)$, thus improving the current known bound for the problem by a factor of $d$. If the polynomial has only real roots, then our bound becomes $\sOB(d^4+d^3τ+ d^2τ^2)$, thus matching the bound of the numerical algorithms by Reif \cite{r-focs-1993} and by Ben-Or and Tiwari \cite{bt-joc-1990}. Actually the latter bound holds in a more general setting, that is under the rather mild assumption that $Ω(d/\lg^c{d})$, where $c\geq 0$ is a constant, roots contribute to the sign variations of the coefficient list of the polynomial. This is the only bound on exact algorithms that matches the one of the numerical algorithms by Pan \cite{Pan02jsc} and Schönhage \cite{Sch82}. To our knowledge the presented bounds are the best known for the problem of real root isolation for algorithms based on exact computations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Elias Tsigaridas. 2011-04-26. Improved complexity bounds for real root isolation using Continued Fractions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1764

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Complete Reductions and Idempotent Representations for $RΠΣ^*$-towers

$RΠΣ^*$-extensions form a rich class of difference rings that provide a unified algebraic framework for modeling indefinite nested sums, transcendental products, and nested products over roots of unity structures that frequently appear in combinatorics, number theory, and particle physics. For a large subclass of these extensions whose ring of constants is a field, we introduce a complete reduction approach to resolve the telescoping problem without solving any difference equations. More precisely, we explicitly construct a complement to the subspace of differences over the constant field and develop an algorithm that decomposes any element of the extension into the sum of a difference and a component lying in this complement. Consequently, summability holds if and only if this complementary component is zero. This structural approach yields significant speed-ups for parameterized telescoping and, notably, creative telescoping for deriving linear recurrences of definite sums. Finally, we compute an explicit idempotent representation that extends existing telescoping algorithms and our complete reduction framework to the general class of $RΠΣ^*$-extensions, opening up previously untreatable classes of sums and products.

cs.SC

Refined complexity bounds for rational reconstruction and XGCD through Padé approximants and Cauchy interpolants

When computing with univariate polynomials, two fundamental and related problems are the XGCD and rational reconstruction, classically solved in quasi-linear complexity using the half-gcd algorithm. These problems have various applications in algebraic computations and bear strong connections to linearly recurrent sequences, structured matrices, and continued fractions. This article first gives a collection of algorithmic reductions, showing that rational reconstruction and XGCD can be solved via the computation of bases of relations modulo a freely-chosen polynomial $M(x)$. In particular, one recovers the folklore idea that bases of Padé approximants (i.e., $M(x) = x^d$) can be used to perform quasi-linear rational reconstruction or XGCD, extending to fast algorithms the well-known link between the Berlekamp-Massey algorithm and the extended Euclidean algorithm. One highlight of these reductions is that, instead of approximants, one may rely on Cauchy interpolants (i.e., $M(x)$ vanishes at chosen points). In a second part, this article describes divide-and-conquer algorithms for approximants and interpolants along with complexity analyses showing an explicit leading constant in front of the dominant term. For interpolants, the best leading constant is obtained through a variant that stores polynomials represented by evaluations, and exploits fast extrapolation in order to avoid repeated conversions to the monomial basis; this requires special points, in geometric or arithmetic progression, or FFT points when the base field allows them. Combining the analyses with the reductions leads to the best complexity bounds we are aware of for rational reconstruction and XGCD. Perhaps surprisingly, even Padé approximants or Berlekamp-Massey-like computations, which intrinsically involve $M(x) = x^d$, are accelerated by reducing them to Cauchy interpolation at well-chosen points.

cs.SC

Parallel Integration over Simple Radical Extensions II: Mixed Towers

In Part I we extended the structure theorems underlying the Risch--Norman (parallel Risch) method to a simple radical extension $L=K(y)$, $y^m=q$, of a differential field $K=F(t_1,\dots,t_n)$ closed under the derivation. Here we remove the closure hypothesis: the radical may occupy any position in the tower, so that the derivatives of the generators above it involve $y$ --- the setting of Bronstein's algorithm for mixed elementary functions. The working ring is $\cA=\cO[t_{j+1},\dots,t_n]$, the integral closure of $F[t_1,\dots,t_n]$ in $L$: a Krull domain, free over the polynomial ring on Trager's basis, so that all factorisation remains in a unique factorisation domain. The denominator of the derivation is no longer an element but a divisor $\fd_D$ on $\cA$, and the valuation lemma takes the unified form $v_P(Dg)=v_P(g)-(1+v_P(\fd_D))$ at normal height-one primes, subsuming the shifts $\{1,e_P\}$ of Part I; the proof localises and requires no cancellation analysis. Stability of the class group and the unit group, $\Cl(\cA)\cong\Cl(\cO)$ and $\cA^*=\cO^*$, splits the admissible logands into $S$-units of $\cO$ --- computed by the machinery of Part I --- and irreducible polynomials moving in the upper variables, whose residues must be constants. We prove degree bounds in the top variable and describe the resulting algorithm, which --- unlike the classical parallel method, whose failure proves nothing --- returns certificates of non-elementarity in two situations: a residue outside the constant field, and, when every bound in force is proved, a residue-free remainder that the linear system shows to be non-exact.

cs.SC