Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1012.2202

Transforming a random graph drawing into a Lombardi drawing

Abstract

The visualization of any graph plays important role in various aspects, such as graph drawing software. Complex systems (like large databases or networks) that have a graph structure should be properly visualized in order to avoid obfuscation. One way to provide an aesthetic improvement to a graph visualization is to apply a force-directed drawing algorithm to it. This method, that emerged in the 60's views graphs as spring systems that exert forces (repulsive or attractive) to the nodes. A Lombardi drawing of a graph is a drawing where the edges are drawn as circular arcs (straight edges are considered circular arcs of infinite radius) with perfect angular resolution. This means, that consecutive edges around a vertex are equally spaced around it. In other words, each angle between the tangents of two consecutive edges is equal to $2\pi/d$ where d is the degree of that specific vertex. The requirement of using circular edges in graphs when we want to provide perfect angular resolution is necessary, since even cycle graphs cannot be drawn with straight edges when perfect angular resolution is needed. In this survey, we provide an algorithm that takes as input a random drawing of a graph and provides its Lombardi drawing, giving a proper visualization of the graph.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nicolaos Matsakis. 2010-12-10. Transforming a random graph drawing into a Lombardi drawing. https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.2202

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS