Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1102.0667

The maximum sum and maximum product of sizes of cross-intersecting families

Abstract

We say that a set $A$ \emph{$t$-intersects} a set $B$ if $A$ and $B$ have at least $t$ common elements. A family $\mathcal{A}$ of sets is said to be \emph{$t$-intersecting} if each set in $\mathcal{A}$ $t$-intersects any other set in $\mathcal{A}$. Families $\mathcal{A}_1, \mathcal{A}_2, ..., \mathcal{A}_k$ are said to be \emph{cross-$t$-intersecting} if for any $i$ and $j$ in $\{1, 2, ..., k\}$ with $i \neq j$, any set in $\mathcal{A}_i$ $t$-intersects any set in $\mathcal{A}_j$. We prove that for any finite family $\mathcal{F}$ that has at least one set of size at least $t$, there exists an integer $κ\leq |\mathcal{F}|$ such that for any $k \geq κ$, both the sum and the product of sizes of any $k$ cross-$t$-intersecting sub-families $\mathcal{A}_1, ..., \mathcal{A}_k$ (not necessarily distinct or non-empty) of $\mathcal{F}$ are maxima if $\mathcal{A}_1 = ... = \mathcal{A}_k = \mathcal{L}$ for some largest $t$-intersecting sub-family $\mathcal{L}$ of $\mathcal{F}$. We then study the smallest possible value of $κ$ and investigate the case $k < κ$; this includes a cross-intersection result for straight lines that demonstrates that it is possible to have $\mathcal{F}$ and $κ$ such that for any $k < κ$, the configuration $\mathcal{A}_1 = ... = \mathcal{A}_k = \mathcal{L}$ is neither optimal for the sum nor optimal for the product. We also outline solutions for various important families $\mathcal{F}$, and we provide solutions for the case when $\mathcal{F}$ is a power set.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter Borg. 2012-12-29. The maximum sum and maximum product of sizes of cross-intersecting families. https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0667

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO