Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1102.4914

Statistics of statisticians: Critical mass of statistics and operational research groups in the UK

Ralph Kenna·Bertrand Berche
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Using a recently developed model, inspired by mean field theory in statistical physics, and data from the UK's Research Assessment Exercise, we analyse the relationship between the quality of statistics and operational research groups and the quantity researchers in them. Similar to other academic disciplines, we provide evidence for a linear dependency of quality on quantity up to an upper critical mass, which is interpreted as the average maximum number of colleagues with whom a researcher can communicate meaningfully within a research group. The model also predicts a lower critical mass, which research groups should strive to achieve to avoid extinction. For statistics and operational research, the lower critical mass is estimated to be 9 $\pm$ 3. The upper critical mass, beyond which research quality does not significantly depend on group size, is about twice this value.

Explore related subjects

math.STcs.DLphysics.soc-phstat.TH

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ralph Kenna, Bertrand Berche. 2011-03-06. Statistics of statisticians: Critical mass of statistics and operational research groups in the UK. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010194512007751

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Measures of Dependence based on Wasserstein distances

Measuring dependence between random variables is a fundamental problem in Statistics, with applications across diverse fields. While classical measures such as Pearson's correlation have been widely used for over a century, they have notable limitations, particularly in capturing nonlinear relationships and extending to general metric spaces. In recent years, the theory of Optimal Transport and Wasserstein distances has provided new tools to define measures of dependence that generalize beyond Euclidean settings. This survey explores recent proposals, outlining two main approaches: one based on the distance between the joint distribution and the product of marginals, and another leveraging conditional distributions. We discuss key properties, including characterization of independence, normalization, invariances, robustness, sample, and computational complexity. Additionally, we propose an alternative perspective that measures deviation from maximal dependence rather than independence, leading to new insights and potential extensions. Our work highlights recent advances in the field and suggests directions for further research in the measurement of dependence using Optimal Transport.

math.ST↗
arXiv2026

Change detection with conformal martingales: new optimal constructions, and suboptimality of existing methods

We study distribution-free sequential changepoint detection for independent observations with unknown and unrestricted pre- and post-change laws. We build on the conformal test martingales and associated e-detectors of Vovk(2021), which control the probability of false alarm (PFA) and the average run length (ARL) respectively. The majority of these works focus on validity, with statistical efficiency usually left for simulations. We develop a comprehensive theory of how conformal p-values behave under non-exchangeable data with a changepoint at an unknown time $T$. We use this to analyze the post-change growth and resulting detection delay of conformal martingale methods, and prove that the standard existing methods are suboptimal for PFA and ARL control, and can lead to delays that are $Ω(T)$ and $Ω(\sqrt{\text{ARL}})$ respectively. We propose different conformal e-processes and e-detectors that are provably minimax optimal, with delays $Θ(\log T)$ and $Θ(\log \text{ARL})$ respectively, and have much shorter delays in simulations.

math.ST↗
arXiv2026

Local Optimality and Rigidity of Frobenius Tests for Dense High-Dimensional Covariance Alternatives

We study identity testing for high-dimensional covariance matrices against dense alternatives of unknown direction, with $p/n \to γ$. Along a globally positive quadratic precision path, mixing Gaussian alternatives over a Gaussian Orthogonal Ensemble direction yields a contiguous experiment whose log likelihood reduces to the corrected Frobenius statistic; its upper-tail test attains the limiting weighted-power envelope at every fixed strength. Fixing the prior's Frobenius radius perturbs the mixture by only $O(p^{-1/2})$ in total variation, and exact whitening carries the experiment, the statistic, and its null law to any known null covariance. Separately, under a product-coordinate null, feasibility needs only $4+η$ moments, plus identical distributions over time when means are estimated; studentization and an exact degrees-of-freedom correction preserve the local power. A stability inequality turns near-envelope attainment into null agreement with the Frobenius rule, so uniform noninferiority on the typical dense bulk precludes gains at any contiguous alternative. For trace-matched rank-one alternatives, the corrected statistic is the first likelihood direction when $\vartheta_n \to 0$ and $n\vartheta_n \to \infty$; at fixed strength, the log likelihood ratio in the Onatski-Moreira-Hallin fixed-spike benchmark is governed by a richer linear spectral statistic below the Baik-Ben Arous-Peche threshold, while eigenvalue separation permits cost-free largest-eigenvalue enhancement above it. Simulations illustrate the theory.

math.ST↗