Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1107.0360

Barrier methods for critical exponent problems in geometric analysis and mathematical physics

Jennifer Erway·Michael Holst
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider the design and analysis of numerical methods for approximating positive solutions to nonlinear geometric elliptic partial differential equations containing critical exponents. This class of problems includes the Yamabe problem and the Einstein constraint equations, which simultaneously contain several challenging features: high spatial dimension n >= 3, varying (potentially non-smooth) coefficients, critical (even super-critical) nonlinearity, non-monotone nonlinearity (arising from a non-convex energy), and spatial domains that are typically Riemannian manifolds rather than simply open sets in Rn. These problems may exhibit multiple solutions, although only positive solutions typically have meaning. This creates additional complexities in both the theory and numerical treatment of such problems, as this feature introduces both non-uniqueness as well as the need to incorporate an inequality constraint into the formulation. In this work, we consider numerical methods based on Galerkin-type discretization, covering any standard bases construction (finite element, spectral, or wavelet), and the combination of a barrier method for nonconvex optimization and global inexact Newton-type methods for dealing with nonconvexity and the presence of inequality constraints. We first give an overview of barrier methods in non-convex optimization, and then develop and analyze both a primal barrier energy method for this class of problems. We then consider a sequence of numerical experiments using this type of barrier method, based on a particular Galerkin method, namely the piecewise linear finite element method, leverage the FETK modeling package. We illustrate the behavior of the primal barrier energy method for several examples, including the Yamabe problem and the Hamiltonian constraint.

Explore related subjects

math-phcs.NAgr-qcmath.APmath.MPmath.NAmath.OCphysics.comp-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jennifer Erway, Michael Holst. 2011-07-02. Barrier methods for critical exponent problems in geometric analysis and mathematical physics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.0360

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗