arXiv · 1111.2563
Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent
Abstract
This paper is an answer to the first part of Adrian Kent's One World versus Many : the Inadequacy of Everettian Accounts of Evolution, Probability, and Scientific Confirmation [arXiv:0905.0624]. We take issue with Kent's arguments against many-world interpretations of quantum mechanics. We argue that his reasons for preferring single-world interpretations are logically flawed and that his proposed singleworld alternative to probability theory suffers from conceptual problems. We use a few thought-experiments which show that the problems he raises for probabilities in multiverses also apply in a single universe.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Vincent Duhamel, Paul Raymond-Robichaud. 2011-11-10. Guildenstern and Rosencrantz in Quantumland -- A Reply to Adrian Kent. https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.2563
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.