Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1112.1462

Some applications of metric currents to complex analysis

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show two applications of metric currents to complex analysis. After recalling the basic definitions, we give a detailed proof of the comparison theorem between metric currents and classical ones on a manifold. In Section 3 we introduce the concept of bidimension for a metric current on a finite dimensional space, showing that the usual properties of $(p,q)-$currents still hold, except for the existence of a Dolbeault decomposition. Section 4 is devoted to the analysis of a particular class of complex spaces, whose structure allows us to give a structure theorem for currents, solve the Cauchy-Riemann equation and characterize holomorphic currents. In Section 5, we introduce the concept of bidimension of (global) metric currents on a Banach space and relate it to the behaviour of the finite dimensional projections of the currents. In section 6 we define a new class of currents, the \emph{quasi-local} metric currents, which are usual metric currents when restricted to bounded sets, and we give a definition of $(p,q)-$current in this new class. The last Section shows how to employ these newly defined quasi-local currents in order to obtain a solution to the equation $\debar U=T$, when $T$ is of bidimension $(0,q)$ and its support is bounded; finally, we extend the result to a current $T$ with generic bidimension, $\debar-$closed, with bounded support.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Samuele Mongodi. 2012-06-30. Some applications of metric currents to complex analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00229-012-0575-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Product Principle for Harmonic Schwarz Lemmas: Boxes, Polydiscs, and Metric Geometry

We establish an exact product principle for the Euclidean operator norm of differentials of harmonic maps. For a bounded domain \(G\subset\R^m\) and \(p\in G\), let \(M_G(p)\) denote the supremum of \(\|dF_0\|\) over harmonic maps \(F:\D\to G\) with \(F(0)=p\). For bounded domains \(G_j\subset\R^{m_j}\), we prove \[ M_{G_1\times\cdots\times G_N}(p_1,\ldots,p_N)^2 =\sum_{j=1}^N M_{G_j}(p_j)^2. \] The theorem separates the geometry of the individual factors from the Euclidean geometry of the product: the factor extremal constants combine by a sum-of-squares law, while equality is governed by a single compatibility condition, namely a common maximizing direction for the component differentials. Neither convexity nor attainment of the factor suprema is required. Combining the product principle with the sharp interval and disk factor problems yields exact operator-norm estimates and all equality cases for harmonic maps into boxes and polydiscs. In both families, for every extremal map, the real differential at the origin has one-dimensional image. The same factor constants also define coordinatewise metrics for which the harmonic contraction estimate is sharp when the source disk is equipped with its Poincaré metric of curvature \(-1\). For boxes, the resulting metric is complete and equals twice the restriction of the Kobayashi-Royden metric of the product of vertical strips. For polydiscs, the harmonic product metric is pointwise maximal among contracting metrics of the form \(\max_j a_j(p)|v_j|\), with \(a_j(p)>0\). It is strictly smaller than twice the Kobayashi-Royden metric on every nonzero tangent vector, and its induced path metric is incomplete.

math.CV

Convolution Regularization Preserves the $L^2$-Estimate Property for $(1,n)$-Forms

In this paper, we prove that the \(L^2\)-estimate property for \((1,n)\)-forms is preserved under the standard convolution regularization. As applications, we show that any singular Hermitian metric satisfying the optimal or multiple coarse \(L^2\)-estimate property for \((n,1)\) or \((1,n)\)-forms is Griffiths semi-positive. This resolves a question posed by Deng--Ning--Wang and a question by Inayama.

math.CV