Planar F-Deletion: Approximation, Kernelization and Optimal FPT Algorithms

Fedor Fomin; Daniel Lokshtanov; Neeldhara Misra; Saket Saurabh

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1204.4230

Planar F-Deletion: Approximation, Kernelization and Optimal FPT Algorithms

Fedor Fomin·Daniel Lokshtanov·Neeldhara Misra·Saket Saurabh

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Let F be a finite set of graphs. In the F-Deletion problem, we are given an n-vertex graph G and an integer k as input, and asked whether at most k vertices can be deleted from G such that the resulting graph does not contain a graph from F as a minor. F-Deletion is a generic problem and by selecting different sets of forbidden minors F, one can obtain various fundamental problems such as Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set or Treewidth t-Deletion. In this paper we obtain a number of generic algorithmic results about Planar F-Deletion, when F contains at least one planar graph. The highlights of our work are - A constant factor approximation algorithm for the optimization version of Planar F-Deletion. - A randomized linear time and single exponential parameterized algorithm, that is, an algorithm running in time O(2^{O(k)} n), for the parameterized version of Planar F-deletion where all graphs in F are connected. The algorithm can be made deterministic at the cost of making the polynomial factor in the running time n*log^2 n rather than linear. - A polynomial kernel for parameterized Planar F-deletion These algorithms unify, generalize, and improve a multitude of results in the literature. Our main results have several direct applications, but also the methods we develop on the way have applicability beyond the scope of this paper. Our results -- constant factor approximation, polynomial kernelization and FPT algorithms -- are stringed together by a common theme of polynomial time preprocessing.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Fedor Fomin, Daniel Lokshtanov, Neeldhara Misra, Saket Saurabh. 2012-04-19. Planar F-Deletion: Approximation, Kernelization and Optimal FPT Algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.4230

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗