Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1204.6576

Poincaré's Dynamics of the Electron - A Theory of Relativity?

Abstract

Before 1905, Poincaré stressed the importance of the method of clocks and their synchronization, but unlike Einstein, magnet and conductor (asymmetries in Lorentz's theory regarding the explanation of Faraday's induction) or chasing a light beam and overtaking it, were not a matter of great concern for him. In 1905 Poincaré elaborated Lorentz's electron theory from 1904 in two papers entitled "Sur la dynamique de l'electron". In May 1905 he sent three letters to Lorentz at the same time that Albert Einstein wrote his famous May 1905 letter to Conrad Habicht: "I can promise you in return four works,[...] The fourth paper is only a rough draft at this point, and is an electrodynamics of moving bodies". In the May 1905 letters to Lorentz Poincaré presented the basic equations of his 1905 Dynamics of the Electron. Hence, in May 1905, Poincaré and Einstein both had drafts of papers pertaining to the principle of relativity. Poincaré's draft led to a space-time mathematical theory of groups at the basis of which stood the postulate of relativity, and Einstein's draft led to a kinematical theory of relativity. Poincaré did not renounce the ether. He wrote a new law of addition of velocities, but he did not abandon the tacit assumptions made about the nature of time, simultaneity, and space measurements implicit in Newtonian kinematics. Although he questioned absolute time and absolute simultaneity, he did not make new kinematical tacit assumptions about space and time. He also did not require reciprocity of the appearances, and therefore did not discover relativity of simultaneity: these are the main hallmarks of Einstein's special theory of relativity. Nevertheless, as shown by other writers, Poincaré's theory had influenced later scientists especially Hermann Minkowski.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Galina Weinstein. 2012-04-30. Poincaré's Dynamics of the Electron - A Theory of Relativity?. https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6576

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Astrobiology and the Transformation of Scientific Epistemology

Astrobiology occupies an unusual position within the philosophy of science. Confronted with the n = 1 problem - having only a single example of life to study - it attempts to investigate life beyond Earth while relying entirely on Earth's biosphere as its reference point, a constraint that creates unique epistemic challenges. Unlike traditional sciences with clear predictive frameworks, astrobiology operates as what we might call a transient science: a discipline functioning without foundational certainties, relying predominantly on abductive reasoning, and confronting hypotheses that may remain untestable for decades. It is, in essence, a science of absence - of evidence, certainty, and analogy - where progress lies in refining conceptual and experimental tools to recognize unfamiliar forms of life. This positions astrobiology alongside emerging fields like artificial intelligence and cognitive science within a broader transformation of how scientific knowledge is constructed when dealing with phenomena that transcend direct empirical access.

physics.hist-ph

The wavelength of light as Thomas Young invented it

This paper documents Thomas Young's invention of a concept which he alternately refers to as the ''magnitude'', ''breadth'', ''interval'' or ''length of an undulation'' of light. First, the paper highlights that Young was first to link some concept of a wavelength to a theory of optics and to assign a precise value to this length for each component of the colour spectrum. Then, it sets out an explanation of how Young made up these values. Finally, it examines the reasons why Young introduced an optical wavelength into his theory of light, insofar as these reasons might in turn shed light on why he was first to do so.

physics.hist-ph

Pyroelectricity: A Brief History of its Discovery and Physical Principles - an Overview

This paper deals with the historical development and physical mechanisms of pyroelectricity, a phe-nomenon whose roots date back over 2000 years to ancient times. This paper is aimed at students and engineers as a concise introduction to the subject area. While the attractive effect of heated tourma-line was already described by Theophrastus, scientific systematization did not occur until the 18th century by researchers, such as Aepinus and Canton, who identified the effect of electrical polarization resulting from temperature changes. This essay highlights the path from early analogies to magnetism to the modern crystallographic description by Haüy and Thomson. In the physics section, pyroelectricity is defined as the temperature dependence of the spontaneous polarization in anisotropic solids. At the microscopic level, the permanent dipole moment of an elementary cell is described by the vector sum of individual moments. It is mathematically demonstrated that the macroscopic spontaneous polarization correlates with the surface charge density and is linked to the temperature change via the pyroelectric cofficient. A distinction was made between the primary pyroelectric effect and the secondary effect resulting from the thermal deformation of the crystal. Finally, the renaissance of this field of research through the development of modern infrared detectors and ferroelectric materials in the 20th century was highlighted.

physics.hist-ph