Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1210.3811

Funding, Collateral and Hedging: uncovering the mechanics and the subtleties of funding valuation adjustments

Abstract

The main result of this paper is a collateralized counterparty valuation adjusted pricing equation, which allows to price a deal while taking into account credit and debit valuation adjustments (CVA, DVA) along with margining and funding costs, all in a consistent way. Funding risk breaks the bilateral nature of the valuation formula. We find that the equation has a recursive form, making the introduction of a purely additive funding valuation adjustment (FVA) difficult. Yet, we can cast the pricing equation into a set of iterative relationships which can be solved by means of standard least-square Monte Carlo techniques. As a consequence, we find that identifying funding costs and debit valuation adjustments is not tenable in general, contrary to what has been suggested in the literature in simple cases. The assumptions under which funding costs vanish are a very special case of the more general theory. We define a comprehensive framework that allows us to derive earlier results on funding or counterparty risk as a special case, although our framework is more than the sum of such special cases. We derive the general pricing equation by resorting to a risk-neutral approach where the new types of risks are included by modifying the payout cash flows. We consider realistic settings and include in our models the common market practices suggested by ISDA documentation, without assuming restrictive constraints on margining procedures and close-out netting rules. In particular, we allow for asymmetric collateral and funding rates, and exogenous liquidity policies and hedging strategies. Re-hypothecation liquidity risk and close-out amount evaluation issues are also covered. Finally, relevant examples of non-trivial settings illustrate how to derive known facts about discounting curves from a robust general framework and without resorting to ad hoc hypotheses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrea Pallavicini, Daniele Perini, Damiano Brigo. 2012-12-12. Funding, Collateral and Hedging: uncovering the mechanics and the subtleties of funding valuation adjustments. https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.3811

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Design and pricing of a transparent parametric-modeled loss CAT bond: application to German windstorm

Catastrophe (cat) bonds overcome some lack of reinsurance by sourcing capacity from the wider capital markets. We present a new type of cat bond addressing the known trade-off between moral hazard and basis risk. As our main contributions we propose a trigger mechanism which is entirely transparent and simpler to evaluate compared to indemnity modeling techniques, as well as a methodology to price this cat bond. This is relevant for insurers and public authorities in a world where natural disasters are occurring with increasing frequency and severity due to climate change, but also for players willing to enter the cat bond market for whom the lack of transparency of this asset class has been a significant obstacle. Our trigger is derived from a cost random field which separates the physical hazard, a vulnerability function and the exposure. This allows the trigger to take a flexible form between parametric and modeled loss, in case exposure is taken into account. We present a case study based on historical windstorm events impacting Germany. Using wind speed data from historical storms, we fit a max-stable random field on a resolution which is standard in the reinsurance industry. The availability of industry loss and exposure data allows us to calibrate the vulnerability component to historical observations. Besides measuring the basis risk associated with our trigger, we perform a full model assessment and discuss numerical results.

q-fin.PR

Fundamentals of Perpetual Futures

Perpetual futures are the most popular cryptocurrency derivatives. Perpetuals offer leveraged exposure to their underlying without rollover or direct ownership. Unlike fixed-maturity futures, perpetuals are not guaranteed to converge to the spot price. To minimize the gap between perpetual and spot prices, long investors periodically pay shorts a funding rate proportional to this difference. We derive no-arbitrage prices for perpetual futures in frictionless markets and bounds in markets with trading costs. Empirically, deviations from these prices in crypto are larger than in traditional currency markets, comove across currencies, and diminish over time. An implied arbitrage strategy yields high Sharpe ratios.

q-fin.PR

A deep learning approach for pricing convertible bonds with path-dependent reset and call provisions

This paper develops a deep learning framework for pricing convertible bonds with path-dependent downward reset and issuer call provisions governed by rolling-window triggers. We formulate the valuation problem as a path-dependent partial differential equation (PPDE) that captures both the historical stock-price path and the evolution of the conversion price. Model-specific PPDEs are derived under GBM, CEV, and Heston dynamics. Under suitable conditions, we establish the existence and uniqueness of a piecewise viscosity solution linked by contractual transmission conditions at monitoring dates. For computation, we construct a fixed-grid backward dynamic programming scheme and approximate its conditional expectations using neural networks, with $L^2$ convergence to the exact fixed-grid recursion as the approximation errors vanish. An application to the China CITIC Bank Convertible Bond produces stable prices across the three models and close agreement with the LSMC benchmark, but outperforms in dimensional scaling. The results show that contractual provisions have a greater valuation effect than the choice of underlying dynamics. The call provision reduces the bond value by truncating upside gains, whereas the downward reset provision increases it under the benchmark specification because improved conversion terms dominate the effect of earlier redemption. Delta and Gamma obtained by automatic differentiation of smooth local network approximations closely agree with central finite-difference estimates. The framework provides a flexible approach to pricing and sensitivity analysis for convertible bonds with complex path-dependent provisions.

q-fin.PR