Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 1212.0587

System Wide Analyses have Underestimated Protein Abundances and the Importance of Transcription in Mammals

Abstract

Large scale surveys in mammalian tissue culture cells suggest that the protein expressed at the median abundance is present at 8,000 - 16,000 molecules per cell and that differences in mRNA expression between genes explain only 10-40% of the differences in protein levels. We find, however, that these surveys have significantly underestimated protein abundances and the relative importance of transcription. Using individual measurements for 61 housekeeping proteins to rescale whole proteome data from Schwanhausser et al., we find that the median protein detected is expressed at 170,000 molecules per cell and that our corrected protein abundance estimates show a higher correlation with mRNA abundances than do the uncorrected protein data. In addition, we estimated the impact of further errors in mRNA and protein abundances, showing that mRNA levels explain at least 56% of the differences in protein abundance for the genes detected by Schwanhausser et al., though because one major source of error could not be estimated the true percent contribution could be higher. We also employed a second, independent strategy to determine the contribution of mRNA levels to protein expression. We show that the variance in translation rates directly measured by ribosome profiling is only 12% of that inferred by Schwanhausser et al. and that the measured and inferred translation rates correlate only poorly (R2=0.13). Based on this, our second strategy suggests that mRNA levels explain ~81% of the variance in protein levels. We also determined the percent contributions of transcription, RNA degradation, translation and protein degradation to the variance in protein abundances using both of our strategies. While the magnitudes of the two estimates vary, they both suggest that transcription plays a more important role than the earlier studies implied and translation a much smaller role.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jingyi Jessica Li, Peter J. Bickel, Mark D. Biggin. 2014-01-30. System Wide Analyses have Underestimated Protein Abundances and the Importance of Transcription in Mammals. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.270

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

EMMA: an R/Bioconductor package to automate tracking of metadata in functional enrichment analyses

Summary: Functional enrichment analysis (FEA) is a widely used approach for interpreting high-throughput omics data. However, essential methodological details, such as software versions, analysis parameters, and annotation database releases among others, are often incompletely reported, limiting the reproducibility and transparency of enrichment analyses and complicating the assessment of potentially problematic methodological choices. Here we present EMMA, an R/Bioconductor package that integrates with existing FEA tools and automatically captures provenance metadata, such as annotation metadata, software version, and parameters, during the analysis runtime. Our package provides utilities for accessing and exporting the recorded metadata to facilitate transparent reporting and preserve provenance required for reproducible enrichment analyses. This also enables auditing of the results while remaining compatible with existing Bioconductor workflows. Availability and implementation: EMMA is available on Bioconductor under the MIT license (https: //bioconductor.org/packages/EMMA), with its development version also available on GitHub (https: //github.com/imbeimainz/EMMA).

q-bio.GN↗

Motif-Vocab: StatisticallyCalibrated Transcription-Factor-Identity Tokenization forGenomic Language Models

Tokenization is a central design choice in genomic language models, yet most deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) tokenizers use characters, fixed-length k-mers, or frequency-derived subwords without explicitly using prior information about the specificity of DNA-binding regulatory factors. We introduce Motif-Vocab, a biologically informed tokenizer that scans both DNA strands for statistically calibrated motif matches, emits transcription-factor (TF) identity tokens, and applies nucleotide, $k$-mer, or byte-pair encoding (BPE) to unmatched sequence. Motif-specific null distributions put position-weight matrices (PWMs) of different lengths and degeneracy on a common significance scale; deterministic overlap rules make the representation reproducible. In controlled Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) pretraining on two billion base pairs, real motif libraries outperform randomized-motif controls on 54 of 55 in-scope downstream tasks. On a motif-disjoint recognition task derived from DART-Eval Task 2, TF-specific tokens improve macro-F1 by 0.040 over a position-matched generic motif token and by 0.033 over a matched no-motif tokenizer (95\% bootstrap confidence interval: 0.027--0.038). Motif tokens also receive stronger attribution and produce larger occlusion effects than shuffled controls. Dense no-motif tokenizers remain strong general-purpose baselines, including a near-tie on the five-task BERT-base panel. Thus, Motif-Vocab is not a universal accuracy replacement; it is a targeted, interpretable inductive bias for motif-sensitive genomic modeling.

q-bio.GN↗

Revolutionizing Genomics with Reinforcement Learning Techniques

In recent years, Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful tool for solving a wide range of problems, including decision-making and genomics. The exponential growth of raw genomic data over the past two decades has exceeded the capacity of manual analysis, leading to a growing interest in automatic data analysis and processing. RL algorithms are capable of learning from experience with minimal human supervision, making them well-suited for genomic data analysis and interpretation. One of the key benefits of using RL is the reduced cost associated with collecting labeled training data, which is required for supervised learning. While there have been numerous studies examining the applications of Machine Learning (ML) in genomics, this survey focuses exclusively on the use of RL in various genomics research fields, including gene regulatory networks (GRNs), genome assembly, and sequence alignment. We present a comprehensive technical overview of existing studies on the application of RL in genomics, highlighting the strengths and limitations of these approaches. We then discuss potential research directions that are worthy of future exploration, including the development of more sophisticated reward functions as RL heavily depends on the accuracy of the reward function, the integration of RL with other machine learning techniques, and the application of RL to new and emerging areas in genomics research. Finally, we present our findings and conclude by summarizing the current state of the field and the future outlook for RL in genomics.

q-bio.GN↗