Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1305.1204

The interplanetary magnetic field: radial and latitudinal dependences

Abstract

Results of the analysis of spacecraft measurements at 1-5.4 AU are presented within the scope of the large-scale interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) structure investigation. The work is focused on revealing of the radial IMF component (Br) variations with heliocentric distance and latitude as seen by Ulysses. It was found out that |Br| decreases as ~r^-5/3 in the ecliptic plane vicinity (10 deg. of latitude). This is consistent with the previous results obtained on the basis of five spacecraft in-ecliptic measurements (Khabarova, Obridko, 2012). The difference between the experimentally found (r^-5/3) and commonly used (r^-2) radial dependence of Br may lead to mistakes in the IMF recalculations from point to point in the heliosphere. This can be one of the main sources of the 'magnetic flux excess' effect, which is exceeding of the distantly measured magnetic flux over the values obtained through the measurements at the Earth orbit. It is shown that the radial IMF component can be considered as independent of heliolatitude in a rough approximation only. More detailed analysis demonstrates an expressed |Br| (as well as the IMF strength) increase in the latitudinal vicinity of 30 deg. relative to the ecliptic plane. Also, a slight increase of the both parameters is observed in the polar solar wind. The analysis of the latitudinal and radial dependences of the Br distribution's bimodality is performed. The investigation has not revealed any dependence between Br and the solar wind speed V. Meanwhile, the two-peak distribution of the solar wind speed as measured by Ulysses is a consequence of a strong latitudinal and solar cycle dependence of V. It is shown that the solar wind speed in high latitudes (above 40 deg.) anti-correlates with a solar activity: V is maximal during the solar cycle minima, and it has a minimum at the maximum of solar activity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Olga V. Khabarova. 2013-07-25. The interplanetary magnetic field: radial and latitudinal dependences. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063772913110024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

First Observation of a Polar Coronal Hole-like Fast Solar Wind Stream in the Sub-Alfvénic Solar Corona: an Analysis of Turbulence Properties

Parker Solar Probe, near its 23rd perihelion in March 2025, sampled an extended interval of sub-Alfvénic solar wind likely originating from a large equatorial coronal hole. At heliocentric distances of approximately 10 solar radii, with speed mostly above 400 km/s, this interval is a first example of ``polar coronal hole-like (PCH-l) fast" solar wind observed in the sub-Alfvénic solar corona. We characterize the turbulence properties of this unique interval using Parker Solar Probe measurements. Despite being sampled well inside the nominal Alfvén surface, the turbulence appears to be already well developed while remaining strongly transverse and highly imbalanced, exhibiting a large cross helicity. These observations provide new constraints on the development and evolution of solar wind turbulence within the lower corona.

physics.space-ph

The Localized 12-hour Wave Over Alaska: Leveraging Meridional Wind Measurements From the Sodium Lidar

The 12-h wave in meridional winds in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) during the solar minimum 2018-2019 Arctic winter is investigated using sodium lidar observations at Poker Flat Research Range (PFRR), Chatanika, Alaska (64N,147W). Nightly 12-h wave amplitudes increased significantly during December-January, with amplitudes exceeding 130 m/s above 97 km on several days. This was more than double the 12-h wave amplitudes observed outside this time period. Meteor radar winds over Chatanika also showed significant increase in meridional wind 12-h wave amplitudes at altitudes between 82 and 97 km during this time period with lower amplitudes than lidar measurements. The strong variation in 12-h wave amplitudes was not correlated with SME index, though the largest amplitudes coincided with the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in early January. Measurements were compared to a seasonal WACCM-X model run and four days of HIAMCM. For the four dates of available HIAMCM data, 12-h wave amplitudes over Chatanika were found to be similar between both HIAMCM and WACCM-X and the lidar below 97 km, with amplitudes measured by lidar exceeding the models at altitudes between 97-105 km. All measurements followed a similar seasonal trend with increasing amplitudes at the end of December/early January. Fits of SW2 from WACCM-X show the SW2 tidal amplitude following similar seasonal trends to 12-h wave measurements. These high-resolution lidar measurements indicate that localized 12-h wave amplitudes are larger than previously reported by studies using meteor radar measurements.

physics.space-ph

Coordinate Systems and Transforms in Space Physics: Terms, Definitions, Implementations, and Recommendations for Reproducibility

In space physics, acronyms for coordinate systems (e.g., \texttt{GEI}, \texttt{GSM}) are commonly used; however, differences in their definitions and implementations can prevent reproducibility. In this work, we compare definitions in online resources, software packages, and frequently cited journal articles and show that implementation differences can lead to transformations between same-named coordinate systems and position values from different data providers to differ significantly. Based on these comparisons and results, and to enable reproducibility, we recommend that (a) a standard for acronyms and definitions for coordinate systems is developed, similar to equivalents in astronomy or earth sciences; (b) a standards body develops a citable database of reference data needed for these transforms. For software that computes coordinate transforms, we also recommend that their developers provide explicit comparisons of their implementations with the results of (b) and documentation on implementation choices. Additionally, we provide recommendations for scientists and metadata developers to ensure that sufficient information is provided to enable reproducibility. Finally, we document that spacecraft positions from data providers can differ both because of differences in how they implemented transforms and because of differences in the original source of the position data, and provide recommendations to improve the documentation of spacecraft positional datasets.

physics.space-ph