Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1307.6363

Biclique Covers and Partitions

Abstract

The biclique cover number (resp. biclique partition number) of a graph $G$, $\mathrm{bc}(G$) (resp. $\mathrm{bp}(G)$), is the least number of biclique (complete bipartite) subgraphs that are needed to cover (resp. partition) the edges of $G$. The \emph{local biclique cover number} (resp. local biclique partition number) of a graph $G$, $\mathrm{lbc}(G$) (resp. $\mathrm{lbp}(G)$), is the least $r$ such that there is a cover (resp. partition) of the edges of $G$ by bicliques with no vertex in more than $r$ of these bicliques. We show that $\mathrm{bp}(G)$ may be bounded in terms of $\mathrm{bc}(G)$, in particular, $\mathrm{bp}(G)\leq \frac{1}{2}(3^\mathrm{bc(G)}-1)$. However, the analogous result does not hold for the local measures. Indeed, in our main result, we show that $\mathrm{lbp}(G)$ can be arbitrarily large, even for graphs with $\mathrm{lbc}(G)=2$. For such graphs, $G$, we try to bound $\mathrm{lbp}(G)$ in terms of additional information about biclique covers of $G$. We both answer and leave open questions related to this. There is a well known link between biclique covers and subcube intersection graphs. We consider the problem of finding the least $r(n)$ for which every graph on $n$ vertices can be represented as a subcube intersection graph in which every subcube has dimension $r$. We reduce this problem to the much studied question of finding the least $d(n)$ such that every graph on $n$ vertices is the intersection graph of subcubes of a $d$-dimensional cube.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Trevor Pinto. 2014-06-23. Biclique Covers and Partitions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.6363

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Small doublings in abelian groups of prime power torsion

Let $A$ be a subset of $G$, where $G$ is a finite abelian group of torsion $r$. It was conjectured by Ruzsa that if $|A+A|\leq K|A|$, then $A$ is contained in a coset of $G$ of size at most $r^{CK}|A|$ for some constant $C$. The case $r=2$ received considerable attention in a sequence of papers, and was resolved by Green and Tao. Recently, Even-Zohar and Lovett settled the case when $r$ is a prime. In this paper, we confirm the conjecture when $r$ is a power of prime. In particular, the bound we obtain is tight.

math.CO

Graph Polynomial for Colored Embedded Graphs: A Topological Approach

We study finite graphs embedded in oriented surfaces by associating a polynomial to it. The tools used in developing a theory of such graph polynomials are algebraic topological while the polynomial itself is inspired from ideas arising in physics. We also analyze a variant of these polynomials for colored embedded graphs. This is used to describe the change in the polynomial under basic graph theoretic operations. We conclude with several applications of this polynomial including detection of certain classes of graphs and the connection of this polynomial with topological entanglement entropy.

math.CO

Schur positivity of the spiders $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ via noncommutative symmetric functions

We prove that the spider graphs $S(a,2,1)$ and $S(a,4,1)$ are Schur positive for all integers $a\ge1$. Together with the known $e$-positivity results, this completes the $e$- and Schur-positivity classification of both families. Our approach uses noncommutative symmetric functions, including a particularly simple ribbon expansion for the path lift with coefficients given by powers of two. We give a new proof of the Shareshian--Wachs path formula at $t=1$ and construct corresponding lifts for spiders. The Littlewood--Richardson rule converts their ribbon expansions into a general Schur-coefficient formula in terms of weighted Yamanouchi words. Mass-preserving multi-injections and a reduction to finitely many inequalities in degree $10$ then prove the required positivity; exact computer verification of these inequalities completes the proof in full generality.

math.CO