On the Challenge of Plasma Heating with the JET Metallic Wall

M-L Mayoral; V Bobkov; A Czarnecka; I Day; A Ekedah; P Jacquet; M Goniche; R King; K Kirov; E Lerche; J Mailloux; D Van Eester; O Asunta; C Challis; D Ciric; J W Coenen; L Colas; C Giroud; M Graham; I Jenkins; E Joffrin; T Jones; D King; V Kiptily; C C Klepper; C Maggi; R. Maggiora; F Marcotte; G Matthews; D Milanesio; I Monakhov; M Nightingale; R Neu; J Ongena; T Pütterich; V Riccardo; F Rimini; J Strachan; E Surrey; V Thompson; G Van Rooij; JET EFDA contributors

doi:10.1088/0029-5515/54/3/033002

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1309.0948

On the Challenge of Plasma Heating with the JET Metallic Wall

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The major aspects linked to the use of the JET auxiliary heating systems: NBI, ICRF and LHCD, in the new JET ITER-like wall (JET-ILW) are presented. We show that although there were issues related to the operation of each system, efficient and safe plasma heating was obtained with room for higher power. For the NBI up to 25.7MW was safely injected; issues that had to be tackled were mainly the beam shine-through and beam re-ionisation before its entrance into the plasma. For the ICRF system, 5MW were coupled in L-mode and 4MW in H-mode; the main areas of concern were RF-sheaths related heat loads and impurities production. For the LH, 2.5 MW were delivered without problems; arcing and generation of fast electron beams in front of the launcher that can lead to high heat loads were the keys issues. For each system, an overview will be given of: the main modifications implemented for safe use, their compatibility with the new metallic wall, the differences in behavior compared with the previous carbon wall, with emphasis on heat loads and impurity content in the plasma.

Explore related subjects

physics.plasm-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M-L Mayoral, V Bobkov, A Czarnecka, I Day, A Ekedah, P Jacquet, M Goniche, R King, K Kirov, E Lerche, J Mailloux, D Van Eester, O Asunta, C Challis, D Ciric, J W Coenen, L Colas, C Giroud, M Graham, I Jenkins, E Joffrin, T Jones, D King, V Kiptily, C C Klepper, C Maggi, R. Maggiora, F Marcotte, G Matthews, D Milanesio, I Monakhov, M Nightingale, R Neu, J Ongena, T Pütterich, V Riccardo, F Rimini, J Strachan, E Surrey, V Thompson, G Van Rooij, JET EFDA contributors. 2013-09-04. On the Challenge of Plasma Heating with the JET Metallic Wall. https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515%2F54%2F3%2F033002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Runaway electron interactions with whistler waves in tokamak plasmas: energy-dependent transport scaling

Resonant interactions between high energy runaway electrons (REs) and whistler waves are a promising mechanism for RE mitigation in tokamak plasmas. While prior studies have largely relied on quasi-linear diffusion models in simplified geometries, we present a first-principles-informed framework that models RE-whistler interactions in a 3D tokamak equilibrium. This is achieved by coupling AORSA, which computes whistler eigenmodes for a given tokamak plasma equilibrium, and KORC, a kinetic orbit code that tracks full orbit RE trajectories in prescribed wave fields. Our results demonstrate that REs undergo scattering to large pitch angles and exhibit anomalous diffusion in both pitch-angle and kinetic energy space. Crucially, we observe a transition between diffusive, sub-diffusive, and super-diffusive transport regimes as a function of initial RE energy - an effect not captured by existing quasi-linear models. This anomalous transport behavior represents a significant advancement in understanding RE dynamics in the presence of wave - particle interactions. By identifying the conditions under which anomalous diffusion arises, this work lays the theoretical foundation for designing targeted, wave-based mitigation strategies in future tokamak experiments.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2026

Geodesic Acoustic Modes in pair plasmas confined in tokamak magnetic fields

This paper is devoted to the derivation of the dispersion relation of the Geodesic Acoustic Mode in pair plasmas, i.e. assuming that ions and electrons have the same mass. Geodesic Acoustic Modes are plasma perturbations playing a crucial role in turbulence regulation, and therefore in the determination of the plasma confinement in tokamaks. Experiments with pair plasmas, like electron-positron plasmas, have been proposed with different kinds of confinements, and aim to study fundamental processes in plasma physics and understanding the formation of the early universe.

physics.plasm-ph↗

arXiv2026

Horizon-Aware Early Event Prediction for Tokamak Disruption Alarms

Reliable disruption prediction is essential for the safe operation of future tokamaks. Existing full-distribution survival methods model the complete residual time-to-disruption distribution, whereas operational decisions primarily depend on disruption risk within a finite prediction horizon. This mismatch motivates introducing Early Event Prediction (EEP) objectives into survival-based disruption prediction. We take Deep Survival Machines (DSM) as the full-distribution baseline and propose applying two established EEP methods to tokamak disruption prediction: Temporal Label Smoothing (TLS), which directly predicts disruption probability within a finite horizon, and survTLS, which additionally models the event-time distribution within that horizon. Using a common causal encoder, we compare these methods on DIII-D, Alcator C-Mod, and EAST. We distinguish threshold-free deadline ranking from validation-selected fixed-policy alarm performance and evaluate prediction horizons and encoder architectures. TLS achieves the best mean alarm performance on DIII-D and EAST, whereas all methods perform poorly on Alcator C-Mod. survTLS does not consistently outperform DSM, suggesting that directly learning horizon-level event probability is more effective than modeling detailed within-horizon event-time distributions in the present setting. Finally, the selected prediction horizons and encoder-ablation results vary across devices, reflecting differences in disruption characteristics.

physics.plasm-ph↗