Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 1309.2942

Galaxy mergers on a moving mesh: a comparison with smoothed-particle hydrodynamics

Abstract

Galaxy mergers have been investigated for decades using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), but recent work highlighting inaccuracies inherent in the traditional SPH technique calls into question the reliability of previous studies. We explore this issue by comparing a suite of Gadget-3 SPH simulations of idealised (i.e., non-cosmological) isolated discs and galaxy mergers with otherwise identical calculations performed using the moving-mesh code Arepo. When black hole (BH) accretion and active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback are not included, the star formation histories (SFHs) obtained from the two codes agree well. When BHs are included, the code- and resolution-dependent variations in the SFHs are more significant, but the agreement is still good, and the stellar mass formed over the course of a simulation is robust to variations in the numerical method. During a merger, the gas morphology and phase structure are initially similar prior to the starburst phase. However, once a hot gaseous halo has formed from shock heating and AGN feedback (when included), the agreement is less good. In particular, during the post-starburst phase, the SPH simulations feature more prominent hot gaseous haloes and spurious clumps, whereas with Arepo, gas clumps and filaments are less apparent and the hot halo gas can cool more efficiently. We discuss the origin of these differences and explain why the SPH technique yields trustworthy results for some applications (such as the idealised isolated disc and galaxy merger simulations presented here) but not others (e.g., gas flows onto galaxies in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christopher C. Hayward, Paul Torrey, Volker Springel, Lars Hernquist, Mark Vogelsberger. 2014-06-03. Galaxy mergers on a moving mesh: a comparison with smoothed-particle hydrodynamics. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras%2Fstu957

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Metastable Dark Energy on the Phantom Brane

Recent DESI observations hint at a preference for dynamical dark energy with an equation of state (EoS) that crosses the phantom divide at $w=-1$. In this work, we investigate \textit{metastable} dark energy (DE) on the minimal phantom brane. Braneworld effects lead to $w < -1$ at early times, whereas metastable decay of DE results in $w > -1$ at late times. We consider three metastable decay prescriptions on the phantom brane: an exponentially decaying DE component (M1), decay of DE into non-baryonic dark matter (M2), and decay into dark radiation (M3). Using CMB observations, DESI DR2 BAO measurements, and the DES-Dovekie Type Ia supernova sample, we compare these models with $Λ$CDM, the Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) parametrization, and the minimal phantom-brane model with a non-decaying $Λ$. We find that metastable models on the brane are preferred over $Λ$CDM, their decay rates being $Γ/H_0=0.362\pm0.086$, $0.539\pm0.125$, and $0.483\pm0.112$ for M1, M2, and M3, respectively. Best fits of metastable models improve over $Λ$CDM by $Δχ^2_{\rm MAP}=-17.14$, $-18.76$, and $-18.22$, while the corresponding $Δ{\rm DIC}$ values are $-8.66$, $-9.63$, and $-6.56$. Braneworld screening drives effective phantom behaviour at $z\gtrsim0.4$, while DE decay drives the EoS toward non-phantom values closer to the present epoch, with the phantom divide $w=-1$ being crossed at $z \simeq 0.3$--$0.4$. These results show that the interplay between metastable decay and phantom-brane screening provides a simple physical mechanism for an effective crossing of the phantom divide consistent with DESI observations.

astro-ph.CO↗

CMB constraints on dark matter-proton scattering: investigating prior-volume effects using profile likelihoods

We present profile-likelihood constraints on velocity-independent dark matter-proton scattering, including cases in which only a fraction of dark matter has such non-gravitational interactions. Frequentist profile-likelihood techniques provide prior-independent constraints, circumventing prior-volume effects that we show arise in Bayesian constraints on this model. In the limit where the scattering cross section or the fraction of interacting dark matter approaches zero, the other interacting dark matter model parameters become unconstrained, causing the posterior distribution to favor that region of parameter space. Using Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background anisotropy data, we find a clear impact of prior-volume effects on the posteriors used to place constraints on dark matter scattering. Compared to the frequentist analysis, the Bayesian method consistently overestimates the constraints on the cross section. Given the potentially biased upper limits on models subject to prior-volume effects, such as this one, we recommend supplementing Bayesian constraints with frequentist statistics to better assess the impact of priors.

astro-ph.CO↗

Forecasting Coupled Dark Energy Parameters with the One-Loop Galaxy Power Spectrum

We forecast constraints on the parameters of the coupled dark energy model using DESI and Euclid data with the one-loop galaxy power spectrum. We investigate the distinguishability of our model from the zero-coupling scenario at the $1σ$ level and explore how the parameter constraints depend on the fiducial coupling $β_{\rm fid}$, the fixed potential slope parameter $ν$, the maximum wavenumber $k_{\max}$, and different prior choices. We find that the inclusion of mildly non-linear scales improves the constraints on the coupling by roughly a factor of five. Then, we address the question of which is the minimum value of $β$ that can be distinguished from zero at $1σ$. We find that for our reference case $k_{\rm max}=0.2 h/$Mpc, $β=0.15$ lies roughly $1σ$ above zero. In the most optimistic case with $k_{\rm max}=0.3 h/$Mpc and including a Planck prior on $Ω_{m0}$, this value can be reduced to $0.05$. These values are substantially larger than the current constraints on $β$, but the latter have been obtained assuming $β$ to be constant from at least the decoupling epoch to today, while we only employ late-time data. We conclude therefore that only models that allow for time-varying couplings can be detected with late-time datasets.

astro-ph.CO↗