Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1309.6471

Graphs of Edge-Intersecting Non-Splitting Paths in a Tree: Representations of Holes-Part II

Arman Boyacı·Tınaz Ekim·Mordechai Shalom·Shmuel Zaks
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a tree and a set P of non-trivial simple paths on it, VPT(P) is the VPT graph (i.e. the vertex intersection graph) of the paths P, and EPT(P) is the EPT graph (i.e. the edge intersection graph) of P. These graphs have been extensively studied in the literature. Given two (edge) intersecting paths in a graph, their split vertices is the set of vertices having degree at least 3 in their union. A pair of (edge) intersecting paths is termed non-splitting if they do not have split vertices (namely if their union is a path). We define the graph ENPT(P) of edge intersecting non-splitting paths of a tree, termed the ENPT graph, as the graph having a vertex for each path in P, and an edge between every pair of vertices representing two paths that are both edge-intersecting and non-splitting. A graph G is an ENPT graph if there is a tree T and a set of paths P of T such that G=ENPT(P), and we say that is a representation of G. Our goal is to characterize the representation of chordless ENPT cycles (holes). To achieve this goal, we first assume that the EPT graph induced by the vertices of an ENPT hole is given. In [2] we introduce three assumptions (P1), (P2), (P3) defined on EPT, ENPT pairs of graphs. In the same study, we define two problems HamiltonianPairRec, P3-HamiltonianPairRec and characterize the representations of ENPT holes that satisfy (P1), (P2), (P3). In this work, we continue our work by relaxing these three assumptions one by one. We characterize the representations of ENPT holes satisfying (P3) by providing a polynomial-time algorithm to solve P3-HamiltonianPairRec. We also show that there does not exist a polynomial-time algorithm to solve HamiltonianPairRec, unless P=NP.

Explore related subjects

cs.DM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arman Boyacı, Tınaz Ekim, Mordechai Shalom, Shmuel Zaks. 2018-01-09. Graphs of Edge-Intersecting Non-Splitting Paths in a Tree: Representations of Holes-Part II. https://doi.org/10.23638/dmtcs-20-1-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Oblivious Self-Distance Symmetric Rendezvous on the Integer Line

Symmetric rendezvous on the line is a search problem in which two agents, initially placed at distance $2d$, must follow the same randomized strategy to meet as quickly as possible. In the standard model, agents may condition their actions on the entire execution history, and both the known- and unknown-distance variants admit expected rendezvous time $Θ(d)$. We study the role of memory by introducing oblivious self-distance strategies, in which an agent's decision depends only on her position relative to her own starting location. For an initial separation of $2d$, let $R_d$ denote the optimal oblivious expected rendezvous time in the known-distance setting. We develop two finite-state frameworks based on absorbing Markov chains. Truncated chains give computable upper bounds through finite-support strategies, while weak-peek chains give lower bounds through a revealed-information relaxation. Together, they provide a mechanism for certifying optimality. Using that mechanism, we determine $R_1$ exactly and prove that it is attained by a finite-support strategy. For $d=2,\ldots,6$, numerical optimization gives the same truncation structure and objective values, yielding rigorous upper bounds below $7.83d^2$. We do not prove that the computed weak-peek minimizers are global, but the stability of the computations leads us to conjecture that they are, in which case the corresponding truncated strategies are optimal. We also prove that $R_d=Θ(d^2)$. In the unknown-distance setting, we construct a universal strategy, independent of $d$, with expected rendezvous time $O(d^{2+η})$ for every fixed $η>0$. Thus, under the memory restriction, the known-distance rendezvous time becomes quadratic, while near-quadratic performance remains possible even without knowing $d$. The asymptotic analysis uses birth-death Markov chains and their electrical-network interpretation.

cs.DM↗
arXiv2026

Tournaments not inducible by five voters

A tournament T is k-inducible if there are k linear orders on its vertex set such that, for every arc $i \to j$ of T, a majority of the orders rank i above j. For odd k, let N(k) be the least order at which some tournament is not k-inducible. Only N(3) = 8 is known exactly; for N(5) the best bounds were $12 \le N(5) \le 38$, from our previous paper [2], which also gave the first explicit example of moderate order, the Paley tournament $P_{43}$. Results. A bespoke search algorithm improves both ends: $13 \le N(5) \le 23$. The upper bound comes from proving that $P_{23}$ is not 5-inducible, the case Bachmeier et al. [1] reported they could not decide, their SAT solver not having terminated within a cumulative six weeks; ours takes 22 hours on one laptop. The lower bound comes from an analysis at order 12. We also show that $P_{31}$ is not 5-inducible, while $P_{19}$ is 5-inducible but not with unit margin, that is, not by a profile in which every arc is carried by exactly three voters against two. Both $P_{19}$ and $P_{23}$ are arc-critical for their respective properties, whereas $P_{31}$ and $P_{43}$ are not vertex-critical: deleting a vertex leaves a tournament that is still not 5-inducible. Method. The search places one vertex at a time, always choosing the vertex with the fewest options left, and propagates the consequences. Together with the automorphisms of the tournament, this decides on a single laptop instances that neither integer programming nor a general-purpose SAT solver can settle. The refutations for $P_{19}$ and $P_{23}$ are certified as well: the search is split into independent subproblems, a SAT solver emits a machine-checkable proof for each, and a separate program rechecks every proof. All results, subject to two human-checked lemmas, are reproducible from https://github.com/Leonardini/TournamentsBeyond5Voters.

cs.DM↗
arXiv2026

Two-Machine Flow Shop with a Fixed Non-Availability Interval on the Second Machine

This paper investigates a two-machine permutation flow shop in which the second machine is unavailable during one fixed interval $[s,t]$. We consider the non-resumable setting: an operation interrupted by the interval must restart from the beginning after the machine becomes available. The objective is to minimize the makespan. We establish three results. First, we give a polynomial-time $10/7$-approximation algorithm. Second, we develop a pseudopolynomial-time exact dynamic program. Third, we prove that the problem does not admit a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$, even when the non-availability interval has unit length. Together, these results characterize a distinctive complexity profile: exact optimization is possible in pseudopolynomial time, whereas the usual route from such an algorithm to an FPTAS is impossible unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$. They also reveal an approximability separation from the corresponding non-resumable problem with the interval on the first machine.

cs.DM↗