Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1401.1845

Sources of Variability in Alpha Emissivity Measurements at LA and ULA Levels, a Multicenter Study

Abstract

Alpha emissivity measurements are important in the semiconductor industry for assessing the suitability of materials for use in production processes. A recently published round-robin study that circulated the same samples to several alpha counting centers showed wide center-to-center variations in measured alpha emissivity. A separate analysis of these results hypothesized that much of the variation might arise from differences in sample-to-entrance window separations. XIA recently introduced an ultra low background counter, the UltraLo-1800 (UltraLo), that operates in a fundamentally different manner from the proportional counters used at most of the centers in the original study. In particular, by placing the sample within the counting volume, it eliminates the sample-to-entrance window separation issue noted above, and so offers an opportunity to test this hypothesis. In this work we briefly review how the UltraLo operates and describe a new round-robin study conducted entirely on UltraLo instruments using a set of standard samples that included two samples used in the original study. This study shows that, for LA (Low Alpha between 2 and 50 alpha/khr-cm$^2$) sample measurements, the only remaining site-to-site variations were due to counting statistics. Variations in ULA (Ultra-Low Alpha < 2 alpha/khr-cm$^2$) sample measurements were reduced three-fold, compared to the earlier study, with the measurements suggesting that residual activity variations now primarily arise from site-to-site differences in the cosmogenic background.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B. D. McNally, S. Coleman, W. K. Warburton, J. Autran, B. M. Clark, J. Cooley, M. S. Gordon, Z. Zhu. 2014-03-04. Sources of Variability in Alpha Emissivity Measurements at LA and ULA Levels, a Multicenter Study. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.02.052

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Development of an Extensible Unified Control System Using the STARS Framework and Common Commands for Detector Control

A zooming optical system comprising two Fresnel zone plates (FZPs) was developed and installed at the AR-NE1A beamline of the Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Japan. To ensure reliable and versatile operation, we implemented a dedicated control architecture based on the Simple Transmission and Retrieval System (STARS) framework and the newly proposed STARS Common Commands for Detector Control (CCDC)---a data-acquisition (DAQ) state model and command set designed specifically for detector control. The system serves both as a practical control system for the zooming optics and as a demonstration of modular extensibility using STARS and detector interoperability through CCDC. The system has been commissioned, and its performance has been verified at the AR-NE1A beamline. The architecture enables flexible configuration of optical components and provides a unified interface for both routine operation and advanced experimental protocols.

physics.ins-det

Agentic TCAD Calibration Workflow for Oxide Semiconductor Transistors

Experimental TCAD calibration is essential for predictive technology modeling of emerging oxide semiconductor transistors. However, it remains time-consuming and expert dependent because of model ambiguity. Multiple physical models and parameter sets can reproduce the same measured transfer characteristics, while local fitting alone cannot uniquely identify the underlying device physics. We present the first demonstration of an agentic TCAD calibration workflow for a fabricated bottom-gate In--W--O (BG-IWO) transistor. Starting from the measured transfer curve and device information, the workflow uses measurement--TCAD residuals and local sensitivity tests to select bounded parameter corrections or evaluate additional physical models, and accept only updates that improve device metrics. The LLM agent orchestrates the workflow, while Sentaurus governs the device physics. For the 2\%-W reference device, five agent-suggested updates yield a fixed calibrated model, reducing the multi-metric device objective $J$ by 14.3$\times$. Maximum $V_{\mathrm{th}}$/$I_{\mathrm{on}}$ errors are 36.1~mV/0.022 decade for varying-drain-bias tests and 46.2~mV/0.062 decade for varying-channel-length tests, demonstrating model transferability across bias and geometry rather than a local parameter fit. W-composition tests provide process-sensitive insight. This agentic workflow provides a faster route to model development for emerging device technologies.

physics.ins-det

Birefringence of AlGaAs/GaAs Coatings under Above-Band-Gap Illumination, GR Noise and Photo-Optic Transfer Function

AlGaAs/GaAs coatings are being considered as coating candidates for gravitational-wave detectors. In this paper we investigate the birefringence properties of this crystalline semiconductor material by modulating the optical illumination on the mirror coating and monitoring the induced birefringence. While the measured low-frequency birefringence values align with previous studies, we observed a frequency-dependent behavior in the illumination-to-birefringence coupling, characterized by a pole increasing with illumination intensity and a gain at zero frequency (DC gain) decreasing with illumination intensity. We developed a generic theoretical model based on a master equation to characterize the measurement results by considering photon-induced electric fields and electro-optic effects. This model can fit the frequency and intensity dependencies of the induced birefringence. Additionally, this model predicts a generation-recombination noise (GR noise) will be observable in the coating birefringence. While the presented measurement cannot predict the exact level of GR noise, for the frequency band and spot sizes relevant for gravitational-wave detectors we expect GR noise to be white below the pole frequency, scale with power the same way laser shot noise does, and for fixed power be independent of spot size.

physics.ins-det