Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1401.6848

AM with Multiple Merlins

Scott Aaronson·Russell Impagliazzo·Dana Moshkovitz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We introduce and study a new model of interactive proofs: AM(k), or Arthur-Merlin with k non-communicating Merlins. Unlike with the better-known MIP, here the assumption is that each Merlin receives an independent random challenge from Arthur. One motivation for this model (which we explore in detail) comes from the close analogies between it and the quantum complexity class QMA(k), but the AM(k) model is also natural in its own right. We illustrate the power of multiple Merlins by giving an AM(2) protocol for 3SAT, in which the Merlins' challenges and responses consist of only n^{1/2+o(1)} bits each. Our protocol has the consequence that, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), any algorithm for approximating a dense CSP with a polynomial-size alphabet must take n^{(log n)^{1-o(1)}} time. Algorithms nearly matching this lower bound are known, but their running times had never been previously explained. Brandao and Harrow have also recently used our 3SAT protocol to show quasipolynomial hardness for approximating the values of certain entangled games. In the other direction, we give a simple quasipolynomial-time approximation algorithm for free games, and use it to prove that, assuming the ETH, our 3SAT protocol is essentially optimal. More generally, we show that multiple Merlins never provide more than a polynomial advantage over one: that is, AM(k)=AM for all k=poly(n). The key to this result is a subsampling theorem for free games, which follows from powerful results by Alon et al. and Barak et al. on subsampling dense CSPs, and which says that the value of any free game can be closely approximated by the value of a logarithmic-sized random subgame.

Explore related subjects

cs.CCquant-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Scott Aaronson, Russell Impagliazzo, Dana Moshkovitz. 2014-01-27. AM with Multiple Merlins. https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.6848

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Lettericity Is NP-Complete

The lettericity of a graph $G$ is the smallest size of a set $Σ$ such that there exist $w_1, \ldots, w_{|V(G)|} \in Σ$ and a decoder $D \subseteq Σ^2$ for which $G$ is isomorphic to the letter graph $(\{1, \ldots, |V(G)|\}, \{ij : 1 \le i < j \le |V(G)|, w_iw_j \in D\})$. It took around two decades of the study of lettericity for, in the simpler case of paths, a closed-form expression for its lettericity to be derived; this suggests that the question of whether the lettericity of an arbitrary graph can be computed in polynomial time is nontrivial. Indeed, this question has been raised repeatedly as an open problem in recent literature. We solve this problem by showing that the lettericity problem on arbitrary graphs is NP-complete (Theorem 10). We also prove that the coloring extension problem (the same problem as lettericity, with the added condition that if $f$ is the isomorphism mapping from $G$ to the letter graph, $w_{f(v)} = χ(v)$ for a given coloring $χ$ of $G$) is NP-complete (Theorem 12). We also resolve the open problem of classifying the complexity of the word extension problem, which is the same problem as lettericity except that the $w_i$ are fixed; we show it to be NP-complete (Theorem 13), which, in tandem with our NP-completeness result for coloring extension, contrasts with the known result that when the constraint of the coloring extension problem and the constraint of the word extension problem are both applied to lettericity, lettericity can be decided in polynomial time. Additionally, we use the reduction in the NP-completeness proof to show that unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis is false, there cannot exist a deterministic algorithm to decide whether the lettericity of an $n$-vertex graph is at most $k$ in time $2^{o(n)}$, even when $n = 6k$ (Theorem 11).

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

NP-Hardness of Bounded Distance Decoding for Reed-Solomon Codes

For an $[n,K]$ Reed--Solomon code, the covering radius is $n-K$. Gandikota, Ghazi, and Grigorescu proved deterministic NP-hardness of bounded-distance decoding when the decoding radius is $d$ below the covering radius for every $1\le d\le c\log n/\log\log n$, where $c>0$ is an absolute constant. We prove that, for every fixed rational $0<α<1/2$, bounded-distance decoding is NP-complete under deterministic polynomial-time many-one reductions over explicitly represented finite extension fields for the additive gap $d=\lfloor n^α\rfloor$ below the covering radius. The hard codes have odd block length~$n$, dimension $K=(n+1)/2-d$, decoding radius $(n-1)/2$, and rate tending to $1/2$. The alphabet size is subexponential in the evaluation set size: for a fixed $0<η<1$ depending only on $α$, it is $2^{Θ(n^η\log n)}=2^{o(n)}$. The proof passes through moments subset sum on $n-1$ nonzero field elements, with required subset size $(n-1)/2$ and $d$ prescribed moments. The arithmetic ingredient is a uniform positive-completion theorem over prime fields $\mathbb{F}_q$ with $q\ge d^{2+ρ}$, for any fixed $ρ>0$. A sharper form follows from a higher-dimensional point-count estimate based on Deligne's theorem; the weaker form used in our reduction is proved more elementarily using additive-character orthogonality, the one-variable Weil bound, a moment identity of order $2d$, and Newton identities. A universal completion pool, an extension-field quotient construction, and a deterministic linear-size simultaneous power condenser complete the reduction.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Constant-Probability Witness Isolation Implies $\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{P/poly}$

Valiant and Vazirani isolate a satisfying assignment of a circuit with probability $Ω(1/n)$. Dell, Kabanets, van Melkebeek, and Watanabe showed that success above $2/3$ implies $\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{P/poly}$ and asked about the range in between. We show that every positive constant already implies the collapse: if a randomized nonuniform polynomial-size pruning procedure succeeds with probability $ε$ on affine circuit inputs with at most $2^{\lfloor 2/ε\rfloor}$ satisfying assignments, then $\mathrm{NP}\subseteq\mathrm{P/poly}$. Success $10/\log L$ on affine inputs with at most $L^{1/3}$ satisfying assignments suffices, where $L$ is the description length, and on inputs with one or two satisfying assignments the threshold $2/3$ drops to $3/5$. No cryptographic assumption is used, and the procedure may read the entire circuit. The proof compiles a pool of circuits into one circuit whose satisfying assignments are indexed by tags in $\mathbb{F}_2^d$. Each member is assigned an affine region of tag space, and if one member is unsatisfiable, the satisfying set shrinks to that member's region. Because regions may overlap and have different dimensions, the collapse reduces to a combinatorial bound: no set of tags meets more than a $2/d$ fraction of an equally weighted family of affine subspaces of all dimensions below $d$ in exactly one point. This regional counting cannot go below order $1/\log L$. The range between $Θ(1/n)$, achieved by affine hashing, and $O(1/\log n)$ remains open.

cs.CC↗