arXiv · 1403.1911
We prove that playing Candy Crush to achieve a given score in a fixed number of swaps is NP-hard.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Toby Walsh. 2014-03-08. Candy Crush is NP-hard. https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1911
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We prove that exact Euclidean decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete on the coefficient lattices of nonzero principal ideals in the power-of-two cyclotomic rings $R_d:=\mathbb{Z}[y]/(y^d+1)$. Our deterministic reduction from Exact Cover by 3-Sets (X3C) produces a target and a squared threshold $Δ$ such that the closest squared distance is exactly $Δ$ in YES instances and at least $Δ+4$ in NO instances. This also implies $\mathsf{NP}$-hardness of exact search-CVP under polynomial-time Turing reductions. We also transfer the resulting principal-ideal CVP instances to full-rank principal ideals of the cyclic quotient ring $\mathbb{Z}[X]/(X^D-1)$, where $D:=2d$. Their coefficient lattices are invariant under cyclic coordinate shifts. The lift preserves principality and multiplies corresponding squared distances by eight. Thus, on principal cyclic ideal lattices, exact decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete and exact search-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. We also obtain uniformly computable fixed cyclotomic and cyclic families in which only the target and threshold depend on the X3C collection. Consequently, a polynomial-time solution to exact decision-CVPP on either family would imply $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq\mathsf{P}/\mathrm{poly}$ and collapse the polynomial hierarchy to $Σ_2^{\mathsf{P}}$. To our knowledge, the cyclic results answer Micciancio's questions of whether exact decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard on cyclic lattices and on a fixed family of cyclic lattices, even when restricted to full-rank principal cyclic ideals. Finally, under the coefficient embedding, we prove that exact decision-module-SIVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete on free rank-two modules over the same cyclotomic rings.
We initiate the study of constructing explicit pseudorandom generators for thresholds of halfspaces with seed length polylogarithmic in the number of halfspaces. This class of functions lies at the frontier of circuit complexity [CTW26]. We show that the generator designed by O'Donnell, Servedio, and Tan for polytopes [OST22] also fools this broader class. To analyze the generator, we develop a threshold-specific smooth approximation framework based on a Bentkus-type mollifier. We prove derivative bounds for this mollifier and also establish a Boolean anticoncentration theorem for thresholds of halfspaces via a random thinning argument. These ingredients imply that the generator $δ$-fools every $k$-out-of-$m$ threshold of $m$ halfspaces over $\{-1,1\}^n$ with seed length $\widetilde{O}(κ^{6+2\varepsilon}\log^{6+2\varepsilon}\!m\cdotδ^{-(2+2\varepsilon)}\log n)$, for any arbitrarily small constant $\varepsilon>0$, where $κ=\min\{k,m-k+1\}$. The random thinning argument also yields bounds on the noise sensitivity and Gaussian surface area for thresholds of halfspaces, leading to learning algorithms under both the uniform and Gaussian distributions.
Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), fixed-parameter tractability and polynomial-time solvability coincide for homomorphism problems specified by classes of pattern hypergraphs of bounded incidence degeneracy or bounded primal independence number. In both cases, tractability is characterised by bounded fractional hypertree width. Grohe (JACM 2007) established the corresponding FPT-PTIME equivalence under bounded arity. Our result allows unbounded arity and covers important cases such as bounded-degree patterns and patterns whose incidence graphs exclude a fixed minor. Building on the recent fractional balanced-separator framework and rounding theorem of Korchemna et al. (FOCS 2024), we prove a near-linear bound on fractional hypertree width ($\mathsf{fhw}$) in terms of adaptive width ($\mathsf{adw}$). For every hypergraph $H$ with $\mathsf{adw}(H)\geq 2$, \[ \mathsf{fhw}(H)=O\bigl(λ(H)\mathsf{adw}(H)\log\mathsf{adw}(H)\bigr), \] where $λ(H)=\min\{μ(H),\max\{1,\logα(H)\}\}$, with $μ(H)$ denoting incidence degeneracy and $α(H)$ the independence number of the primal graph. As a further consequence, we obtain a corresponding FPT-PTIME collapse for exact homomorphism counting on every bounded-$λ$ class. More generally, for every recursively enumerable class of pattern hypergraphs, fixed-parameter tractability of the parameterised homomorphism problem implies quasipolynomial-time solvability of the corresponding unparameterised problem, assuming ETH.