O(log log rank) Competitive-Ratio for the Matroid Secretary Problem

Oded Lachish

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1403.7343

O(log log rank) Competitive-Ratio for the Matroid Secretary Problem

Oded Lachish

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the \textit{Matroid Secretary Problem} (MSP), the elements of the ground set of a Matroid are revealed on-line one by one, each together with its value. An algorithm for the MSP is \textit{Matroid-Unknown} if, at every stage of its execution: (i) it only knows the elements that have been revealed so far and their values, and (ii) it has access to an oracle for testing whether or not any subset of the elements that have been revealed so far is an independent set. An algorithm is \textit{Known-Cardinality} if, in addition to (i) and (ii), it also initially knows the cardinality of the ground set of the Matroid. We present here a Known-Cardinality and \textit{Order-Oblivious} algorithm that, with constant probability, selects an independent set of elements, whose value is at least the optimal value divided by $O(\log{\logρ})$, where $ρ$ is the rank of the Matroid; that is, the algorithm has a \textit{competitive-ratio} of $O(\log{\logρ})$. The best previous results for a Known-Cardinality algorithm are a competitive-ratio of $O(\logρ)$, by Babaioff \textit{et al.} (2007), and a competitive-ratio of $O(\sqrt{\logρ})$, by Chakraborty and Lachish (2012). In many non-trivial cases the algorithm we present has a competitive-ratio that is better than the $O(\log{\logρ})$. The cases in which it fails to do so are easily characterized. Understanding these cases may lead to improved algorithms for the problem or, conversely, to non-trivial lower bounds.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Oded Lachish. 2014-09-02. O(log log rank) Competitive-Ratio for the Matroid Secretary Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.7343

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗