Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1404.2898

Comparative orbital evolution of transient Uranian co-orbitals: exploring the role of ephemeral multibody mean motion resonances

C. de la Fuente Marcos·R. de la Fuente Marcos
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Uranus has three known co-orbitals: 83982 Crantor (2002 GO9), 2010 EU65 and 2011 QF99. Here, we perform a comparative analysis of the orbital evolution of these transient co-orbitals to understand better how they got captured in the first place and what makes them dynamically unstable. We also look for additional temporary Uranian co-orbital candidates among known objects. Our N-body simulations show that the long-term stability of 2011 QF99 is controlled by Jupiter and Neptune; it briefly enters the 1:7 mean motion resonance with Jupiter and the 2:1 with Neptune before becoming a Trojan and prior to leaving its tadpole orbit. During these ephemeral two-body mean motion resonance episodes, apsidal corotation resonances are also observed. For known co-orbitals, Saturn is the current source of the main destabilizing force but this is not enough to eject a minor body from the 1:1 commensurability with Uranus. These objects must enter mean motion resonances with Jupiter and Neptune in order to be captured or become passing Centaurs. Asteroid 2010 EU65, a probable visitor from the Oort cloud, may have been stable for several Myr due to its comparatively low eccentricity. In addition, we show that the orbital properties and discovery circumstances of known objects can be used to outline a practical strategy by which additional Uranus' co-orbitals may be found.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.EP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C. de la Fuente Marcos, R. de la Fuente Marcos. 2014-04-30. Comparative orbital evolution of transient Uranian co-orbitals: exploring the role of ephemeral multibody mean motion resonances. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras%2Fstu733

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A 36.34-day Sub-Neptune Candidate Transiting the Nearby K Dwarf TIC 402710280

Transiting sub-Neptunes on orbits longer than a month are rare around bright stars. We report a candidate with a 36.34-day period around TIC 402710280, a $V = 10.0$ K dwarf at 66.8 pc that the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) has observed only in full-frame images. Four transits from 2021 to 2026, reduced by three independent pipelines, have consistent depths (mean $2092 \pm 47$ ppm) and a duration of $5.27 \pm 0.05$ h. Two are 36.36 days apart. The light curves exclude every shorter period consistent with both down to one day, and the duration disfavors still shorter ones, leaving $P = 36.33986 \pm 0.00051$ d. The candidate's radius is $3.75 \pm 0.22\,R_\oplus$ and its equilibrium temperature $498 \pm 21$ K. Difference-image centroids place the signal $1.5'' \pm 1.3''$ from the target, and eclipse models of the only nearby Gaia source, $3.5''$ away, fit worse than a planet by $Δχ^2 \geq 142$ for every main-sequence pair. TRICERATOPS gives a false-positive probability of $0.003 \pm 0.004$; without high-resolution imaging, the object remains a candidate. The transit times scatter about a linear ephemeris by 21.8 min (rms), and an independent reduction reproduces the largest departure. Four transits cannot separate timing systematics from transit-timing variations. A second signal, of $407 \pm 26$ ppm at 3.78 days, may come from the target, an unresolved companion, or the background star. We predict a transit in TESS Sector 114 on 2027 February 19.

astro-ph.EP↗
arXiv2026

A sub-Earth-sized TESS planet candidate in the nearby M-dwarf binary GJ 774, most likely orbiting GJ 774 A (TIC 351339274)

Small planets transiting the nearest M dwarfs are the terrestrial planets most accessible to detailed characterisation. We report a sub-Earth-sized transiting planet candidate in the wide (17.6") M-dwarf binary GJ 774 at 12.86 pc, most likely orbiting the M2.5 primary GJ 774 A (TIC 351339274). The signal was a SPOC multi-sector threshold-crossing event (MES = 7.95) and is not a TESS Object of Interest. In eight TESS sectors (2019-2026) a 1.28-h transit recurs every 4.225138 +/- 0.000010 d with a box-mean depth of 365 +/- 32 ppm in A's light. The 2026 data, which entered neither the SPOC search nor our selection, show it at the ephemeris predicted from 2019-2023 data (304 +/- 43 ppm; none of 10^5 phase-scrambled versions of the 2026 data is as deep). The per-target false-alarm probability is < 0.03 at 95%. Odd/even, secondary-eclipse, archival-plate and Gaia radial-velocity tests exclude unrelated blended eclipsing binaries and eclipsing companions on 4.2-d orbits, and hierarchical eclipsing binaries are improbable. The stars are 0.85 TESS pixel apart, so the TRICERATOPS false-positive probability (0.26) is set by a planet on GJ 774 B. B is disfavoured because its own light does not dim enough: PRF-deblended photometry gives 109 +/- 115 ppm in B's light, against 1089 ppm required if B were the host. Conditional on a point source at A or at B, the joint host model gives P(A)=0.59-0.97 (0.97 for the native target-pixel baseline). Over all sectors the PRF photometry is consistent with A, but in the out-of-sample 2026 data 40% of the deficit appears at B's position, an unexplained 2-3 sigma (PSF-model and depth dependent) tension with host A. On A the planet has R_p=0.70 +/- 0.06 R_Earth, S=15.0 +/- 1.8 S_Earth and T_eq=548 +/- 16 K. It is not validated; resolved ground-based photometry of the pair would test host B directly.

astro-ph.EP↗
arXiv2026

Uncertainty estimation of incoming comet trajectories with a thermophysical non-gravitational force model for Comet Interceptor encounter planning

The European Space Agency Comet Interceptor mission is designed to fly-by an as-yet undetermined incoming long-period or dynamically-new comet, which will require an accurate prediction of its trajectory. Cometary orbits are perturbed from purely gravitational trajectories by non-gravitational accelerations (NGAs) stemming from their outgassing, however, and these must be taken into account in the navigation. We here test the ability of ground-based astrometry and standard NGA-fitting techniques to predict the position and velocity of incoming comets perturbed by a Monte Carlo sampled thermophysical acceleration model. We find that, due to the difficulties of predicting NGA evolution as well as the limitations of reasonably simulated astrometry, predicted accuracies are unlikely to meet the mission goals of 1000 km and 1 m s$^{-1}$ in position and velocity, sixty days before intercept. We instead recommend expanded uncertainties of $10,000$ km and several m s$^{-1}$. Our NGA fits struggle to reproduce the reference accelerations and trajectories when outgassing is rising steeply at a few AU-incoming, but with more observations up until perihelion, do eventually converge, leading to good estimates of many of the underlying acceleration parameters even for half an orbital arc.

astro-ph.EP↗