Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1406.6169

Fault Tolerant Approximate BFS Structures

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of designing a {\em fault-tolerant} $(α, β)$ approximate BFS structure (or {\em FT-ABFS structure} for short), namely, a subgraph $H$ of the network $G$ such that subsequent to the failure of some subset $F$ of edges or vertices, the surviving part of $H$ still contains an \emph{approximate} BFS spanning tree for (the surviving part of) $G$, satisfying $dist(s,v,H\setminus F) \leq α\cdot dist(s,v,G\setminus F)+β$ for every $v \in V$. We first consider {\em multiplicative} $(α,0)$ FT-ABFS structures resilient to a failure of a single edge and present an algorithm that given an $n$-vertex unweighted undirected graph $G$ and a source $s$ constructs a $(3,0)$ FT-ABFS structure rooted at $s$ with at most $4n$ edges (improving by an $O(\log n)$ factor on the near-tight result of \cite{BS10} for the special case of edge failures). Assuming at most $f$ edge failures, for constant integer $f>1$, we prove that there exists a (poly-time constructible) $(3(f+1), (f+1) \log n)$ FT-ABFS structure with $O(f n)$ edges. We then consider {\em additive} $(1,β)$ FT-ABFS structures. In contrast to the linear size of $(α,0)$ FT-ABFS structures, we show that for every $β\in [1, O(\log n)]$ there exists an $n$-vertex graph $G$ with a source $s$ for which any $(1,β)$ FT-ABFS structure rooted at $s$ has $Ω(n^{1+ε(β)})$ edges, for some function $ε(β) \in (0,1)$. In particular, $(1,3)$ FT-ABFS structures admit a lower bound of $Ω(n^{5/4})$ edges. Our lower bounds are complemented by an upper bound, showing that there exists a poly-time algorithm that for every $n$-vertex unweighted undirected graph $G$ and source $s$ constructs a $(1,4)$ FT-ABFS structure rooted at $s$ with at most $O(n^{4/3})$ edges.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Merav Parter, David Peleg. 2014-06-24. Fault Tolerant Approximate BFS Structures. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.6169

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS