USAT: A Unified Score-based Association Test for Multiple Phenotype-Genotype Analysis

Debashree Ray; James S Pankow; Saonli Basu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1409.2984

USAT: A Unified Score-based Association Test for Multiple Phenotype-Genotype Analysis

Debashree Ray·James S Pankow·Saonli Basu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Genome-wide Association Studies (GWASs) for complex diseases often collect data on multiple correlated endo-phenotypes. Multivariate analysis of these correlated phenotypes can improve the power to detect genetic variants. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) can perform such association analysis at a GWAS level, but the behavior of MANOVA under different trait models has not been carefully investigated. In this paper, we show that MANOVA is generally very powerful for detecting association but there are situations, such as when a genetic variant is associated with all the traits, where MANOVA may not have any detection power. We investigate the behavior of MANOVA, both theoretically and using simulations, and derive the conditions where MANOVA loses power. Based on our findings, we propose a unified score-based test statistic USAT that can perform better than MANOVA in such situations and nearly as well as MANOVA elsewhere. Our proposed test reports an approximate asymptotic p-value for association and is computationally very efficient to implement at a GWAS level. We have studied through extensive simulation the performance of USAT, MANOVA and other existing approaches and demonstrated the advantage of using the USAT approach to detect association between a genetic variant and multivariate phenotypes. We applied USAT to data from three correlated traits collected on 5,816 Caucasian individuals from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study and detected some interesting associations.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Debashree Ray, James S Pankow, Saonli Basu. 2015-03-11. USAT: A Unified Score-based Association Test for Multiple Phenotype-Genotype Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.2984

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗