Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1410.0576

Mapping Energy Landscapes of Non-Convex Learning Problems

Abstract

In many statistical learning problems, the target functions to be optimized are highly non-convex in various model spaces and thus are difficult to analyze. In this paper, we compute \emph{Energy Landscape Maps} (ELMs) which characterize and visualize an energy function with a tree structure, in which each leaf node represents a local minimum and each non-leaf node represents the barrier between adjacent energy basins. The ELM also associates each node with the estimated probability mass and volume for the corresponding energy basin. We construct ELMs by adopting the generalized Wang-Landau algorithm and multi-domain sampler that simulates a Markov chain traversing the model space by dynamically reweighting the energy function. We construct ELMs in the model space for two classic statistical learning problems: i) clustering with Gaussian mixture models or Bernoulli templates; and ii) bi-clustering. We propose a way to measure the difficulties (or complexity) of these learning problems and study how various conditions affect the landscape complexity, such as separability of the clusters, the number of examples, and the level of supervision; and we also visualize the behaviors of different algorithms, such as K-mean, EM, two-step EM and Swendsen-Wang cuts, in the energy landscapes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria Pavlovskaia, Kewei Tu, Song-Chun Zhu. 2014-10-02. Mapping Energy Landscapes of Non-Convex Learning Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.0576

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Optimal Learning Rate Schedules under Functional Scaling Laws: Power Decay and Warmup-Stable-Decay

We study optimal learning rate (LR) schedules under the functional scaling law (FSL) framework (Li et al., 2025), which decomposes training dynamics into signal learning and noise forgetting. In power-law kernel regression, these two components are governed by a source exponent $s>0$ and a capacity exponent $q>1$, respectively, with smaller $s$ corresponding to harder tasks. For a fixed training horizon $N$, we characterize the schedules that minimize the final-step loss under a stability constraint and reveal a sharp phase transition. In the easy-task regime $s>1-1/q$, the optimal schedule follows power decay from the beginning of training; in the hard-task regime $s<1-1/q$, it becomes warmup-stable-decay (WSD)-like (Hu et al., 2024), staying at the largest admissible LR for most of training before a final decay. In both regimes, the decay exponent is $2q-1$: task difficulty determines when to decay, while model capacity determines how to decay. Beyond the exact optimum, we study fractional schedules, whose shape is defined over relative training progress. We show that precise tuning of the decay shape is often unnecessary: a broad class of profiles attains the optimal convergence rate, while overly slow terminal decay leads to schedule-induced capacity saturation. Finally, for one-pass SGD in kernel regression, FSL-motivated power-decay schedules achieve optimal last-iterate rates. Experiments support the theoretical predictions and the task-dependent transition between early and delayed decay.

stat.ML

Differential Privacy of Gaussian Process Posterior Sampling

We study the privacy of releasing functional posterior sample paths from a Gaussian process (GP) when the entire training set including covariates and responses is private. Unlike standard differential-privacy (DP) mechanisms that inject external noise, posterior sampling is intrinsically random and we show that this randomness provides useful privacy guarantees. We derive Rényi-DP guarantees separating privacy leakage through the posterior mean from a distinct channel induced by the data-dependent posterior covariance. The analysis identifies effective ridge regularisation and covariance scale as the principal privacy-controlling quantities and yields sharper guarantees in several regimes of practical interest as well as extensions to repeated and adaptive releases. Membership inference attacks confirm the predicted dependence on regularisation, covariance scale and the number of released paths. Utility experiments on downstream posterior sampling tasks identify noisy observation regimes where privacy-compatible regularisation preserves useful samples. Finally we identify large-data asymptotic regime in which the privacy parameter and posterior mean-square risk vanish simultaneously, yielding privacy for free. Together, these results provide a comprehensive characterisation of privacy and utility of GP posterior sampling.

stat.ML

Optimal Transport for Network Comparison: A Unified Review with New Spectral Bounds and Machine Learning Applications

Network comparison using optimal transport is a growing area of research in network science. Unlike standard graph metrics, optimal transport computes both network dissimilarity and a transport plan that explains how one graph morphs into another. In this paper, we review how optimal transport compares undirected, unweighted simple graphs using three primary distances: the Wasserstein, Gromov-Wasserstein, and Bures-Wasserstein distances. We examine the closed form of the Wasserstein distance in one dimension via node feature probability distributions, and show how the transport plans of the Wasserstein and Gromov-Wasserstein distances visualize how mass is shifted to transform one network into another. Beyond reviewing existing transport-based approaches, we establish new spectral lower and upper bounds for the Bures-Wasserstein distance and characterize the tightness of the lower bound under eigenbasis perturbations. Finally, we evaluate these distances using a synthetic network dataset for clustering and a real-world temporal network.

stat.ML