Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 1411.3678

An Efficient Radiative Cooling Approximation for Use in Hydrodynamic Simulations

Abstract

To make relevant predictions about observable emission, hydrodynamical simulation codes must employ schemes that account for radiative losses, but the large dimensionality of accurate radiative transfer schemes is often prohibitive. Stamatellos and collaborators introduced a scheme for smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations based on the notion of polytropic pseudo-clouds that uses only local quantities to estimate cooling rates. The computational approach is extremely efficient and works well in cases close to spherical symmetry, such as in star formation problems. Unfortunately, the method, which takes the local gravitational potential as an input, can be inaccurate when applied to non-spherical configurations, limiting its usefulness when studying disks or stellar collisions, among other situations of interest. Here, we introduce the "pressure scale height method," which incorporates the fluid pressure scale height into the determination of column densities and cooling rates, and show that it produces more accurate results across a wide range of physical scenarios while retaining the computational efficiency of the original method. The tested models include spherical polytropes as well as disks with specified density and temperature profiles. We focus on applying our techniques within an SPH code, although our method can be implemented within any particle-based Lagrangian or grid-based Eulerian hydrodynamic scheme. Our new method may be applied in a broad range of situations, including within the realm of stellar interactions, collisions, and mergers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

James C. Lombardi Jr., William G. McInally, Joshua A. Faber. 2014-11-13. An Efficient Radiative Cooling Approximation for Use in Hydrodynamic Simulations. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras%2Fstu2432

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A spatial filter for mitigating radio interference and its application to CHIME/FRB Outriggers

The sensitivity of radio telescopes is becoming increasingly limited by the presence of radio frequency interference (RFI), which will worsen as the radio spectrum becomes more crowded. One context where this poses a challenge is the field of fast radio burst (FRB) science, where there is increasing scientific interest in capturing as large of a population of bursts as possible and accurately measuring their celestial coordinates using interferometry. With several modern radio facilities actively collecting data for large FRB surveys that will be transformative to the field, properly mitigating unwanted interference is essential for the science goals of these surveys to be met. In this work, we present variations of a spatial filter based on the Karhunen-Loeve (KL) Transform to enhance the sensitivity of radio interferometers and demonstrate its applicability to FRB detection and localization. We derive a particular variation of the filter for the case of point-like radio pulses, which we show reduces to the maximum-signal-to-noise beamformer. We apply this filter to CHIME/FRB baseband data and demonstrate its capability to enhance the sensitivity and overall localization rate of CHIME/FRB Outriggers. We compare the cross-correlation signal-to-noise obtained using the spatial filter with that obtained using a spectral-kurtosis RFI flagger for a sample of 100 FRBs recorded by CHIME and its Outriggers, and show that this filter will double the total number of FRBs successfully localized with the CHIME/FRB Outrigger telescopes. While demonstrated here in the context of CHIME/FRB Outriggers, the spatial filter presented in this work--which we have made publicly available--is broadly applicable to other interferometric radio facilities engaged in FRB science and transient detection, including next-generation telescopes such as CHORD, DSA-2000, BURSTT, and CHARTS.

astro-ph.IM↗

ECLIPSE-X: Plate-Scale Calibration as the Binding Constraint on Relativistic Astrometry with Spacecraft Navigation

Precision stellar astrometry near the Sun can constrain the parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) parameter gamma through gravitational light deflection. This study develops ECLIPSE-X, a localized multi-frame estimation architecture in which one persistent relativistic parameter is estimated simultaneously with frame-dependent spacecraft line-of-sight and roll states, separated by their differing spatial signatures and by the persistence of gamma across frames. The aim is not a competitive determination of gamma, but an assessment of whether such a joint solution and its formal covariance stay statistically valid under realistic astrometric model error. A synthetic field of 250 stars spanning 1.22-8 apparent solar radii is observed over 40 frames at 5-s cadence; weighted least squares estimates gamma with three navigation states per frame, and Schur-complement marginalization gives the formal uncertainty in gamma after navigation coupling. The nominal solution recovers gamma = 1.0001198167 with sigma_gamma = 3.075104e-4, and a 1000-realization ensemble confirms calibration. Perturbations unknown to the estimator identify plate-scale mismatch as the dominant failure mechanism: a 300-ppm scale error alone inflates the empirical-to-formal uncertainty ratio to 7126.6 with zero 1-sigma and 2-sigma coverage, against 2.18 for catalog-coordinate mismatch and 1.12 for a frame-coherent radial perturbation, while every realization converges numerically: convergence does not guarantee statistical validity. Augmenting the state with a plate-scale parameter restores consistency, at a fixed 21.2% cost in the precision of gamma set by the correlation between the two persistent parameters. A calibration sweep shows the unaugmented estimator is covariance-consistent only below sigma_p = 2.7884e-8, so the augmented state is a requirement, not a refinement, for near-Sun relativistic astrometric estimators.

astro-ph.IM↗

The Platonic Universe: Do Foundation Models See the Same Sky?

We investigate when foundation models converge towards shared representations, and how this convergence depends on model capacity, training regime, and model architecture. We take a `science-for-AI' approach, using astronomy as an experimental instrument to test the Platonic Representation Hypothesis and its Aristotelian refinement against an external physical reference. The historical success of astrophysics is evidence that a compact, modality-invariant description of galaxy observables exists, and so representation convergence toward reality should be measurable against the physical parameters astronomers already use. Given this framework, we evaluate eleven foundation model families (spanning classification, self-distillation, joint-embedding prediction, autoencoding, vision-language pre-training, and astro-specific architectures from $\mathcal{O}$(10M)${\to}\mathcal{O}$(10B) parameters) on crossmatched JWST, HSC, and Legacy imagery, and DESI spectroscopy. All models are evaluated frozen, with no astronomy-specific fine-tuning. We probe redshift, stellar mass, and sSFR via linear probes, and local (MKNN) and global (CKA) embedding geometry within families, between modalities, and across architectures. We find that physics performance scales predictably with capacity; probe directions align consistently with expected astrophysical correlations and selection effects; and local (not global) embedding alignment tracks physics performance, including between DESI spectra and HSC imagery---modalities that share essentially no low-level statistics. Our results support the ARH over the strict PRH, demonstrate astronomy's value as an experimental framework for neural representation learning, and suggest that astro-foundation models can build on general-purpose pre-trained architectures, capitalizing on the broader open machine learning community's already-spent computational investment.

astro-ph.IM↗