Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 1505.07133

Elastohydrodynamics and kinetics of protein patterning in the immunological synapse

Abstract

The cellular basis for the adaptive immune response during antigen recognition relies on a specialized protein interface known as the immunological synapse (IS). Understanding the biophysical basis for protein patterning by deciphering the quantitative rules for their formation and motion is an important aspect of characterizing immune cell recognition and thence the rules for immune system activation. We propose a minimal mathematical model for the physical basis of membrane protein patterning in the IS, which encompass membrane mechanics, protein binding kinetics and motion, and fluid flow in the synaptic cleft. Our theory leads to simple predictions for the spatial and temporal scales of protein cluster formation, growth and arrest as a function of membrane stiffness, rigidity and kinetics of the adhesive proteins, and the fluid in the synaptic cleft. Numerical simulations complement these scaling laws by quantifying the nucleation, growth and stabilization of proteins domains on the size of the cell. Direct comparison with experiment shows that passive elastohydrodynamics and kinetics of protein binding in the synaptic cleft can describe the short-time formation and organization of protein clusters, without evoking any active processes in the cytoskeleton. Despite the apparent complexity of the process, our analysis highlights the role of just two dimensionless parameters that characterize the spatial and temporal evolution of the protein pattern: a ratio of membrane elasticity to protein elasticity, and the ratio of a hydrodynamic time scale for fluid flow relative to the protein binding rate, and we present a simple phase diagram that encompasses the variety of patterns that can arise.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andreas Carlson, L. Mahadevan. 2015-05-26. Elastohydrodynamics and kinetics of protein patterning in the immunological synapse. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004481

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Rapid prediction of organisation in engineered corneal, glial and fibroblast tissues using machine learning and biophysical models

We present a machine learning approach for predicting the organisation of corneal, glial and fibroblast cells in 3D cultures used for tissue engineering. Our machine-learning-based method uses a generative adversarial network architecture called pix2pix, which we train using results from biophysical contractile network dipole orientation (CONDOR) simulations. In the following, we refer to the machine learning method as the RAPTOR (RApid Prediction of Tissue ORganisation) approach. A training data set containing a range of CONDOR simulations is created, covering a range of underlying model parameters. Predictions of the trained neural network are compared with cultured glial, corneal, and fibroblast tissues, with good agreements for both CONDOR and RAPTOR approaches. An approach is developed to determine CONDOR model parameters for specific tissues using both RAPTOR and CONDOR fits to tissue properties. RAPTOR outputs a variety of tissue properties, including cell densities, cell alignments and tension. RAPTOR yields predictions of tissue properties within fractions of a second. This speed makes it valuable for the design of tethered moulds for tissue growth.

physics.bio-ph↗

How do incorrect ligands help detect a correct ligand?

Intrigued by the response of T cell receptors to the presence of a few agonist ligands, we propose a minimal model that can achieve similar performance. The model consists of a small cluster of immobile receptors that bind reversibly to two types (correct/incorrect) of ligands in the environment, with slightly weaker binding strength for the incorrect one. It features binding-state coupling between nearest-neighbor receptors, and receptors in the bound/free states are activated/deactivated by specific enzymes, with rates that allow kinetic proofreading. It is found that, for a range of binding-state coupling strength, incorrect ligands alone cannot activate the receptors, but the binding of merely one correct ligand to a receptor is sufficient to promote the activation of other receptors via induced binding to incorrect ligands. Both response time and signal amplification increase as the receptor binding-state coupling strength increases until it reaches an optimal range to achieve the most rapid and sensitive response. These results suggest a possible mechanism for a speedy and specific response of receptors to very few correct ligands in biological and artificial systems at the subcellular scale.

physics.bio-ph↗

Spatially Resolved Nucleated Polymerization: A Free-Boundary Model of Protein Aggregation in Concentrated Solutions

Kinetic models of protein aggregation describe populations by size, not by spatial organization or morphology. We extend Lumry-Eyring nucleated polymerization to a model in which the monomer is a density field and each aggregate is a region bounded by a level set. Growth is a flux condition on the available sites of a surface. Condensation is a reaction between the bonding sites of two surfaces in contact, at a rate set by the bond rate and the contact geometry. The availability of those sites is a field on the interface, and its equilibrium value follows from Wertheim's perturbation theory. The collision efficiency and the Fuchs stability ratio are therefore computed, not fitted. In a well-mixed limit the model's spatial averages satisfy the rate equations term by term; the monomer fraction agrees to eight parts in ten thousand, a difference that arises from equating aggregate size with volume. The condensation kernel's exponent is $0.5806\pm0.0013$ against the $0.600\pm0.010$ fitted to a monoclonal antibody. The computed stability ratio reproduces thirteen of fourteen published conditions at twelve $k_BT$, but only with the bond rate at the top of its range. In a many-body box, aggregates merge at $2.2$ to $3.8$ times the two-body rate.

physics.bio-ph↗