Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 1508.05870

Lehmer pairs revisited

Abstract

We seek to understand how the technical definition of Lehmer pair can be related to more analytic properties of the Riemann zeta function, particularly the location of the zeros of $ζ^\prime(s)$. Because we are interested in the connection between Lehmer pairs and the de Bruijn-Newman constant $Λ$, we assume the Riemann Hypothesis throughout. We define strong Lehmer pairs via an inequality on the derivative of the pre-Schwarzian of Riemann's function $Ξ(t)$, evaluated at consecutive zeros. Theorem 1 shows that strong Lehmer pairs are Lehmer pairs. Theorem 2 describes the derivative of the pre-Schwarzian in terms of $ζ^\prime(ρ)$. Theorem 3 expresses the criteria for strong Lehmer pairs in terms of nearby zeros $ρ^\prime$ of $ζ^\prime(s)$. We examine 114661 pairs of zeros of $ζ(s)$ around height t=10^6, finding 855 strong Lehmer pairs. These are compared to the corresponding zeros of $ζ^\prime(s)$ in the same range.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jeffrey Stopple. 2015-10-11. Lehmer pairs revisited. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05870

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT