Forecasting Exchange Rates Using Time Series Analysis: The sample of the currency of Kazakhstan

Daniya Tlegenova

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1508.07534

Forecasting Exchange Rates Using Time Series Analysis: The sample of the currency of Kazakhstan

Daniya Tlegenova

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper models yearly exchange rates between USD/KZT, EUR/KZT and SGD/KZT, and compares the actual data with developed forecasts using time series analysis over the period from 2006 to 2014. The official yearly data of National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan is used for present study. The main goal of this paper is to apply the ARIMA model for forecasting of yearly exchange rates of USD/KZT, EUR/KZT and SGD/KZT. The accuracy of the forecast is compared with Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).

Explore related subjects

q-fin.ST stat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Daniya Tlegenova. 2015-08-30. Forecasting Exchange Rates Using Time Series Analysis: The sample of the currency of Kazakhstan. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.07534

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Insider Purchases Far Below the 52-Week High: Decomposing the Disclosure Reaction in Microcap Equities

Purchases reported under transaction code P on SEC Form 4 by insiders of U.S. equities with an estimated filing-date capitalization of USD 30 million to USD 500 million (13,534 lines, 1,192 issuers, 2018-2024) are followed by a first-day abnormal return that rises steeply with the stock's distance below its 52-week high: 4.13% in the quintile farthest below the high against 0.86% nearest it (two-way clustered t = 9.77); random non-event days of the same issuers show 0.14%. Five tests with decision rules fixed in advance characterize the gradient. Most of it is scale: the beaten-down stocks are 3.10 times as volatile, and with a full set of controls the raw gap fails its pre-specified bar (0.94 points, t = 2.11). Per unit of the stock's own volatility the reaction is 2.51 times as large far below the high (t = 7.49), 1.28 to 3.50 on other estimators, though a variance-weighted slope shows none. The gradient is larger than for insider sales by the same issuers and for positive earnings surprises as a class; against the strongest surprises the difference is imprecise. Dropping purchases with a concurrent 8-K leaves the raw gradient intact (t = 7.13), but the per-risk gradient no longer clears the controls (t = 2.52). The reaction runs for two to three sessions; the 29-day drift is imprecise (two-way t = 1.70) and a calendar-time portfolio that skips the first day earns no significant alpha. The analysis quantifies sensitivity to price adjustment and benchmark specification: mixing price bases misassigns run-up buckets, and carrying the estimation-window intercept supplies 57% of the 30-day gradient under that benchmark. A gradient-boosting classifier (test AUC 0.676) is indistinguishable from logistic regression. A separate large-cap extension schedules USD 29,075,559 a year of buyer-cluster flow but fails every matched-comparison gate.

q-fin.ST↗

arXiv2026

Cross-Market Alpha: Testing Short-Term Trading Factors in the U.S. Market via Double-Selection LASSO

We test whether 168 short-horizon price-volume signals from the Alpha191 library, originally developed for China's retail-dominated A-share market, contain pricing information for S&P 500 stocks from 2002 to 2022 beyond 153 established U.S. factors. Using the double-selection LASSO of Feng et al. (2020), 17 signals receive significant stochastic discount factor (SDF) loadings in the baseline test-asset design. Their robustness is uneven. Only three signals (a multi-horizon moving-average ratio, a directional-pressure ratio, and a price-gap correlation) remain significant with a finer test-asset grid and under Elastic Net and principal-component control selection; six more pass most checks, and the remaining eight depend on the specification. Robust signals are concentrated in volume-price interaction and short-term mean reversion, whereas volatility-based signals are fragile.

q-fin.ST↗

arXiv2026

The Endogenous Constraint: Hysteresis, Stagflation, and the Structural Inhibition of Monetary Velocity in the Bitcoin Network (2016-2025)

Bitcoin operates as a macroeconomic paradox: it combines a strictly predetermined, inelastic monetary issuance schedule with a stochastic, highly elastic demand for scarce block space. This paper empirically validates the Endogenous Constraint Hypothesis, positing that protocol-level throughput limits generate a non-linear negative feedback loop between network friction and base-layer monetary velocity. Using a verified Transaction Cost Index (TCI) derived from Blockchain.com on-chain data and Hansen's (2000) threshold regression, we identify a definitive structural break at the 90th percentile of friction (TCI ~ 1.63). The analysis reveals a bifurcation in network utility: while the network exhibits robust velocity growth of +15.44% during normal regimes, this collapses to +6.06% during shock regimes, yielding a statistically significant Net Utility Contraction of -9.39% (p = 0.012). Crucially, Instrumental Variable (IV) tests utilizing Hashrate Variation as a supply-side instrument fail to detect a significant relationship in a linear specification (p=0.196), confirming that the velocity constraint is strictly a regime-switching phenomenon rather than a continuous linear function. Furthermore, we document a "Crypto Multiplier" inversion: high friction correlates with a +8.03% increase in capital concentration per entity, suggesting that congestion forces a substitution from active velocity to speculative hoarding.

q-fin.ST↗