Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1509.00386

Reconstructing eruptive source parameters from tephra deposit: a numerical approach for medium-sized explosive eruptions

A. Spanu·M. de' Michieli Vitturi·S. Barsotti
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Since the seventies, several reconstruction techniques have been proposed, and are currently used, to extrapolate and quantify eruptive parameters from sampled deposit datasets. Discrete numbers of tephra ground loadings or stratigraphic records are usually processed to estimate source eruptive values. Reconstruction techniques like Pyle, Power law and Weibull are adopted as standard to quantify the erupted mass (or volume) whereas Voronoi for reconstructing the granulometry. Reconstructed values can be affected by large uncertainty due to complexities occurring within the atmospheric dispersion and deposition of volcanic particles. Here we want to quantify the sensitivity of reconstruction techniques, and to quantify how much estimated values of mass and grain size differ from emitted and deposited ones. We adopted a numerical approach simulating with a dispersal code a mild explosive event occurring at Mt. Etna, with eruptive parameters similar to those estimated for eruptions occurred in the last decade. Then we created a synthetic deposit by integrating the mass on the ground computed by the model over the computational domain (>50000 km2). Multiple samplings of the simulated deposit are used for generating a large dataset of sampling tests afterwards processed with standard reconstruction techniques. Results are then compared and evaluated through a statistical analysis, based on 2000 sampling tests of 100 samplings points. On average, all the used techniques underestimate deposited and emitted mass. A similar analysis, carried on Voronoi results, shows that information on the total grain size distribution is strongly deteriorated. Here we present a new method allowing an estimate of the deficiency in deposited mass for each simulated class. Finally a sensitivity study on eruptive parameters is presented in order to generalize our results to a wider range of eruptive conditions.

Explore related subjects

physics.geo-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A. Spanu, M. de' Michieli Vitturi, S. Barsotti. 2015-09-01. Reconstructing eruptive source parameters from tephra deposit: a numerical approach for medium-sized explosive eruptions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.00386

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SPBench: A Multi-Task Evaluation Benchmark for Exploration Seismic Processing

Exploration seismic processing underpins subsurface imaging and resource exploration, but learning-based methods remain difficult to compare across studies. Our survey of 368 papers finds widespread reliance on private or difficult-to-reproduce datasets, with only 25 providing public code. This obscures whether reported gains arise from model design or experimental settings. We introduce the Seismic Processing Benchmark (SPBench), covering six tasks: random noise attenuation, trace interpolation, ground-roll suppression, multiple suppression, deblending, and first-arrival picking. We reproduce 24 supervised methods on 10 datasets under 43 standardized settings and release datasets, implementations, configurations, evaluation scripts, and results. To complement global scores and per-trace pick errors, we introduce signal-component-resolved evaluation (SCoRE) for reconstruction and a reference-free ridge-curvature score (RC_norm) for first-arrival picking. Our analyses show that synthetic rankings do not reliably predict field rankings, with task-dependent agreement when models train within each setting. As degradation strengthens, rankings reorder more under coherent ground roll than under random-like interference. The ridge score agrees with MAE-based model rankings in the evaluated settings, with a mean Kendall correlation of 0.881 across three field surveys, while SCoRE reveals frequency- and energy-dependent differences hidden by global scores. SPBench provides a reproducible basis for comparing learning-based seismic processing methods and characterizes how their relative advantages vary across data settings, degradation strengths, and evaluation criteria.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Bayesian full waveform inversion with learned prior using deep convolutional autoencoder

Full waveform inversion (FWI) can be expressed in a Bayesian framework, where the associated uncertainties are captured by the posterior probability distribution (PPD). In practice, solving Bayesian FWI with sampling-based methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is computationally demanding because of the extremely high dimensionality of the model space. To alleviate this difficulty, we develop a deep convolutional autoencoder (CAE) that serves as a learned prior for the inversion. The CAE compresses detailed subsurface velocity models into a low-dimensional latent representation, achieving more effective and geologically consistent model reduction than conventional dimension reduction approaches. The inversion procedure employs an adaptive gradient-based MCMC algorithm enhanced by automatic differentiation-based FWI to compute gradients efficiently in the latent space. In addition, we implement a transfer learning strategy through online fine-tuning during inversion, enabling the framework to adapt to velocity structures not represented in the original training set. Numerical experiments with synthetic data show that the method can reconstruct velocity models and assess uncertainty with improved efficiency compared to traditional MCMC methods.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Assessing foundational atomistic models for iron alloys under Earth's core conditions

We assess the capability of recently developed foundational atomistic models (FAMs) to simulate iron alloys under the extreme pressures and temperatures of Earth's core. Static equations of state for hexagonal close-packed (hcp) and body-centered cubic (bcc) iron, computed using 17 FAMs, are benchmarked against ab initio calculations. Two representative models, MatterSim and MACE, are further evaluated for their ability to reproduce phonon spectra, liquid structure, and melting relations of iron at core conditions. While both models capture several key properties, MACE substantially overestimates the stability of bcc iron and fails to correctly describe the stability of hcp iron. Their performance is also examined for binary liquids, superionic phases, and a seven-component Fe-Ni-Si-S-O-H-C liquid. Although these FAMs were not explicitly trained on data from core conditions, they can reproduce several structural and dynamical properties across a wide range of compositions. However, none of the tested models consistently reproduces all first-principles benchmarks. By analyzing the origins of these discrepancies, we identify several limitations of current FAMs, particularly the lack of an explicit treatment of thermal electronic excitations, which significantly affect phase stability and thermodynamic properties under core conditions. We further discuss directions for improving FAMs to enable predictive simulations of core-forming materials under extreme conditions.

physics.geo-ph↗