Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1509.04669

Warped cones over profinite completions

Damian Sawicki
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We construct metric spaces that do not have property A yet are coarsely embeddable into the Hilbert space. Our examples are so called warped cones, which were introduced by J. Roe to serve as examples of spaces non-embeddable into a Hilbert space and with or without property A. The construction provides the first examples of warped cones combining coarse embeddability and lack of property A. We also construct warped cones over manifolds with isometrically embedded expanders and generalise Roe's criteria for the lack of property A or coarse embeddability of a warped cone. Along the way, it is proven that property A of the warped cone over a profinite completion is equivalent to amenability of the group. In the appendix we solve a problem of Nowak regarding his examples of spaces with similar properties.

Explore related subjects

math.MGmath.GR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Damian Sawicki. 2017-02-20. Warped cones over profinite completions. https://doi.org/10.1142/s179352531850019x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

An approximate counterexample to the Barker--Larman problem in dimension $4$

The Barker--Larman problem asks if a convex body $K \subseteq \mathbb R^n$ containing the Euclidean ball $\mathbb B_n$, such that all the sections of $K$ by hyperplanes tangent to $\mathbb B_n$ have constant $(n-1)$-dimensional volume, must necessarily be a Euclidean ball. In this paper we show a result pointing to a negative answer in dimension $4$. Taking $λ_0 = 4 \sqrt{3}π$ and any $N \in \mathbb N$, we obtain the existence of a family of convex bodies $K_{λ,N}$ with $λ\in (λ_0-r_N, λ_0 + r_N)$, such that the sections of $K_{λ,N}$ by hyperplanes tangent to the Euclidean ball, have area within $c |λ- λ_0|^{N+1}$ of $λ$, while the difference between outradius and inradius of $K_{λ,N}$ is larger than $C |λ- λ_0|$. The bodies $K_{λ,N}$ are constructed via radial functions as \[ρ_{K_{λ,N}}(t) = \cos\left( \sum_{n=0}^N \frac{(λ-λ_0)^n}{n!} φ_n(t) \right)^{-1},\] where $t \in [0,2π), λ\in \mathbb R$ and $φ_n$ are trigonometric polynomials that can be computed explicitly. The convergence of the inner power series when $N \to \infty$ (which is left open) would imply a negative answer to the Barker--Larman problem in dimension $4$. As an example we obtain a convex body whose outradius and inradius differ by more than $0.176$, and the area of the sections oscillate by less than $3 \times 10^{-7}$.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

On convex bodies with rotationally symmetric planar projections

Let $n\ge 3$ and let $K\subset\mathbb R^n$ be a convex body. For a two-dimensional linear subspace $P\subset\mathbb R^n$, let $K|P$ be the orthogonal projection of $K$ onto $P$. We prove that if for every two-dimensional subspace $P$, the planar convex body $K|P$ has $q$-fold rotational symmetry up to translation, then for $q\ge4$, this forces $K$ to be an Euclidean ball. The case $q=3$ is exceptional: non-spherical examples exist.

math.MG↗
arXiv2026

A Spectral Proof of Khachiyan's Ellipsoid Conjecture

For a convex body $K\subset\mathbb{R}^n$, let $w(K)$ denote the volume of its maximum-volume inscribed ellipsoid. We prove that every closed halfspace $H$ whose boundary passes through the center of the maximizing ellipsoid satisfies \[ w(K\cap H)\le\frac{\sqrt e}{2}\,w(K). \] The constant is optimal uniformly over all dimensions, as witnessed by a family of circular cones, thereby establishing Khachiyan's conjecture. The proof converts containment, maximality, and the central-cut condition into algebraic constraints on positive definite matrices. Two complementary spectral bounds from a diagonal model extend to arbitrary center displacements through a directional rank-one estimate for fractional trace powers. Concavity determines their joint optimum. We also derive finite-dimensional bounds and a necessary condition for near equality, with self-contained supporting proofs and an alternative resolvent argument. An AI language model discovered the proof in a human-directed research process. Lean 4 with mathlib verifies the main theorem, sharpness, and supporting results.

math.MG↗